Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life

Blog


« Forum Friday: Discussions from the BrushBuzz art forum 4-06-12 | Main | Art Forgery: Some basics concerning art fraud prosecution »


Follow this Blog



Subscribe to our Newsletter



Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip

 

Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

















abstract art
acrylic painting
advice for artists
art and culture
art and psychology
art and society
art appreciation
art blogging advice
Art Business
art challenge
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art fairs
art forum
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art website design
art website tips
art websites
Art World
art world problems
artist resume advice
artist statement
artist tribute
artist website tips
artist websites
assemblage
BoldBrush
BoldBrush Interview
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
BrushBuzz
Canvoo
Carolyn Henderson
Carrie Turner
cityscape painting
Clint Watson
collage
colored pencil
conceptual art
Connie Tom
copyright
creativity
Daniel Keys
Dealing with art forgery
Deber Klein
digital art
drawing
email newsletters
encaustic painting
etching
exhibiting art online
exposure tips
Facebook
FASO
FASO Art News
FASO Daily Art Show
FASO Featured Artists
figure painting
FineArtViews
FineArtViews Interview Series
functional art
Gayle Faucette Wisbon
glass art
Google
Guest Posts
Holiday
InformedCollector
inspiration
installation art
Instruction
Jack White
Keith Bond
landscape painting
Linda Mikulich
Lisa Call
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Matthew Mahler
mixed media
Moshe Mikanovsky
oil painting
online art competitions
online art groups
originality
painting
pastel
photography
Pinterest
plein air painting
politics
portraits
pricing artwork
realism
religion
Robert Genn
Sarah Maple
sculpting
sculpture
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
social networking
still life art
street art
support local art
Think Tank
tips for exhibiting art
Twitter
watercolor
watermarks
websites for artists
wildlife art




 Archives:May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sep 2012
Aug 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Apr 2012
Mar 2012
Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005

 

Thomas Kinkade, 'Painter of Light', dead at 54

by Brian Sherwin on 4/7/2012 12:24:03 AM

This article is by Brian Sherwin, regular contributing writer for FineArtViews. Brian Sherwin is an art critic, blogger, curator, artist and writer based near Chicago, Illinois. He has been published in Hi Fructose Magazine, Illinois Times, and other publications, and linked to by publications such as The Huffington Post, The Boston Globe, Juxtapoz Magazine, Deutsche Bank ArtMag, ARTLURKER, Myartspace, Blabbermouth, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Conservative Punk, Modern Art Obsession, Citizen LA, Shark Forum, Two Coats of Paint, Vandalog, COMPANY and Art Fag City. If you want your blog posts listed in the FineArtViews newsletter with the possibility of being republished to our 18,000+ subscribers, consider blogging with FASO Artist Websites.  Disclaimer: This author's views are entirely his/her own and may not reflect the views of BoldBrush, Inc.. You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.


Artist Thomas Kinkade, known as the 'Painter of Light', has died. If you have followed my writing over the years, you know that I've been critical of Kinkade for a number reasons. That said, I won't deny (for better or worse) the impact his art has had on the public in general. After all, it has been estimated that Thomas Kinkade prints can be found in 1 out of 20 homes in the United States. Like him or not, Kinkade established a brand that many people within the United States embraced -- he accomplished something that few artists have been able to do... and he did it without the support of high profile NY art dealers, art critics and other professionals who, more often than not, can make or break the career of an artist. I, for one, respect that... even though I'm not a fan of his work.

 

The mainstream art world ridiculed Thomas Kinkade. IF any major art publication mentions his passing, it will likely be done with a 'bite' of sarcasm -- OR will be written in a way that outright mocks those who enjoyed his artwork. That said, Kinkade -- when alive -- took all the criticism in stride. He knew that he had a legion of fans, millions of dollars from his art (some estimate that he was making over $100 million from image merchandise per year), and was a household name. Point blank -- Kinkade was (most likely) more known -- at least by the overall public -- than all of the art writers criticizing him combined.

 

That kind of name recognition is rare. Again, Kinkade achieved that all while going against the grain of the mainstream art world. He did not follow the unwritten rules of success that dominate the high profile gallery world in general... he did not comply with the dictations of art world 'gatekeepers' -- or with the traditional routes of becoming famous within that 'world'. Again, I'm not a fan of his paintings -- but I respect the fact that he was able to become a household name while defying the 'unwritten rules' of those mainstream circles.

 

Think of it this way -- If you say Warhol... people know you are talking about Andy Warhol. If you say Kinkade... people know you are talking about Thomas Kinkade. Two very different artists... two very different directions in art... yet both artists are recognized by your average citizen. Like it or not, Kinkade is one of the most recognized artists in the United States. Very few artists have reached that level of public recognition.

 

I know that some readers may scoff at what I'm about to say... but, independent artists (those not represented by an art gallery) -- OR, those who create artwork that the mainstream gallery world will never accept -- could probably learn a few things from Thomas Kinkade about art marketing. True, he was not always an upfront businessman according to some reports. In addition to that, his character (compared to the persona he cultivated for himself) had been called into question a number of times over the years. Those factors aside, he was able to establish a persona that helped his artwork to be sold -- and he explored alternative exhibit spaces when the big art galleries ignored him. He refused to be ignored. He made opportunities for himself. In that sense, Kinkade was brilliant at marketing his art.

 

Take care, Stay true,

 

Brian Sherwin



[Services:
FASO: Want Your Art Career to Grow?  Set up an Artist Website with FASO.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $6,000 in awards. 

Daily Art Show: Daily Show of Art that reaches thousands of potential collectors.

Backstory: About Clint. Email Editor.  Submit a guest post.  Twitter. Republish. ]


Topics: advice for artists | art marketing | Art World | artist tribute | Brian Sherwin | FineArtViews | Think Tank 

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 66 Comments

carol hallock
via faso.com
He laughed his way all the way to the bank as did BobRoss- something many of us would love to do secretly and won't admit. I for one do not mind making money with my art. It's a better living than doing a 9-5 working for someone else-also way more fulfilling.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Carol -- I'm sure some of the galleries that snubbed him would love to make the money he did. ;p

Teresa Tromp
via faso.com
There aren't too many high profile, celebrity fine artists.

Thomas Kinkade, like him or not, is one of our high celebrity, artist heroes.

When a famous actor dies, it's in the media for a long time. Unless Thomas Kinkade has another wife somewhere, we'll only read about him for a little while.

His work does give me a sense of contentment. He puts me in a dreamworld, and it would be so enchanting to cross over one of those bridges in the mist.

Rest In Peace, Mr. Kinkade.

Jan
via faso.com
Just for the record - Teresa, I would MUCH rather look at any of YOUR work than any of Kincaid's!

Jan
via faso.com
The galleries that snubbed him - also carry works by other artists that might be thought of as questionable in actual talent, but it was the business practice of having official "minions" retouch/"remark" the prints and then sell them as originals is what had the gallery folk irate. That and QVC.

Tine Buma
via faso.com
Re. your article on Thomas Kinkade, well written, Brian!

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Jan -- You said, "but it was the business practice of having official "minions" retouch/"remark" the prints and then sell them as originals is what had the gallery folk irate."

I'm not so sure about that. I mean, look at Damien Hirst -- some of his artwork is created 100 percent by assistants... and the high profile gallery world is 'cool' with that. Same goes for Shepard Fairey -- some of his gallery destined work involves assistants. In that sense, I don't see what Kinkade did with assistants as being any different.


You said, "That and QVC."

You might have a point there. That said, I'm fairly certain that Kinkade had already established his name before associating himself with QVC.

I'll add... isn't it strange that visual artists are looked down upon for going the QVC route... while jewelry/fashion designers are not? Or maybe they are... LOL my knowledge of jewelry / clothing line trends is rather flat.

No matter how you try to slice it... Kinkade was good at getting his work 'out there'. If anything, he showed that an artist can become a household name... even if he or she bypasses the power structures of the BIG time art world.

Constance Vlahoulis
via faso.com
Years ago I bought a book Kinkade wrote with another artist just when they got out of collage.
It is a book of drawing, how to, and the drawings are very good.
I will look for it and report the title in another post.
The works are Very Much different than his later work, that I didn't care for. However, I always gave him kudos for making a fabulous living for him and his family, all from his art. That is something to be very proud of. And he brought happiness to those who loved his art.
My heart goes out to his family and friends.
Gone too soon~


Ernest Britton
via faso.com
I never wanted to own a Kincade piece until his death, and it's certainly not about a monetary investment. It's about a part of American religious sentimentality that will now slip away without his art, and I find myself surprised to admit that I miss him already.

Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Teresa:

I agree with you! Besides being a painter myself, I am a collector.
I never bought any of Kincaids paintings, but I admit there were times I was drawn to the "happiness and charm" of his artwork.
There is so much "ugliness" in our world nowadays! I think I can understand why so many people collected his work. The average American, in my opinion, doesn't know much, or even care much, about "serious" painters, and whether or not the "composition" is correct, or the "brush work" is appealing. They don't understand all that. Those people loved Kincaid because his paintings were soothing, pretty, and brought back happy memories of days gone by. Yes, some of them were "sugary sweet" but apparently millions of people prefer that to other kinds of "so-called" artworks? I think he was a courageous artist to buck the system as he did, and I love that he was successful, in spite of the "critics."

Tine Buma
via faso.com
Appreciated your comment to Teresa, Marsha!

Ernest Britton
via faso.com
You hit it on the head. We all want to believe in the peaceful life promised, and he gave us a doorway right inside our own homes.

anon
via faso.com
The consensus was reached, the "people" obviously loved Kincaid. Thinking in political terms, does that mean that the consensus is correct?

gina agrav
via faso.com
Kincaide was the Madonna of the art world. (take some sort of ability and take the world by storm) Not that he wasn't talented; look at his early plein air work. He probably decided one day, after thinking "Hmm, me and 4,000 other pretty good plein air artist, how much can you REALLY sell" or "Christian based paintings of light; no one is going to criticize artwork with a slight religious theme, and it's pretty and there's nothing to figure out. What the heck, go for it." People like to say he "whored his work out". Okay, so what's the difference between this and someone like Hirst? Hirst whored his work out too, it's just that his pimp was more "respectable" - a world class auction house. Instead of selling a million bible covers, he sold one items piece by piece for a million (or more). Many must admit they would be happy to crank out some bread and butter pieces and have it allow me to create the art I really want to, while paying the bills. I know I would. I was not a fan of the paintings either, but you've got to respect his marketing strategies. I do wonder how one dies of "natural causes" at that age though.....

Jean
via faso.com
You can disparage Kincaide's his artwork and marketing but his foundation has helped children, humanitarian relief, and the arts. $1.5 million was raised for the Salvation Army alone. You can't say that about many other successful artists.

As to the general public not knowing or appreciating serious painters, think about how many prints and calendars of Monet, Van Gogh and O'Keeffe are sold annually.

R.I.P.

Katarzyna Lappin
via faso.com
Brian,

This is such a classy article. I wish there would be more elegance in this world to inspire writing about Kinkade without hate, scoff, twisting his name and turning everything he has done into trash.

I am not a fan of his art either, but I am not a fan of some other well established artists. Art is a free area of expression and let the artists define themselves. Kinkade was successful. He has expressed himself and he has done it to the degree to make a great living out of it. Moreover, if you say Kinkade everybody knows the name, if you mention other artist name (even very well established) most of the average people wouldn't have a clue.

Also being so controversial is another factor building him up. It adds a mystery to his success. There are a lot of factors to respect what he has achieved.


Katarzyna

Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Jean:

You brought up something I'd be curious to find out! Concerning the "general public," and the Old Masters that people buy prints and calendars of? I recall, probably ten years ago at least, a sales manager at a Borders Bookstore telling me they sold more calendars by Kinkade than the Old Masters! I found
that a bit hard to believe, as I was not a huge fan of Kinkade.

However, as I said in my earlier post, I think his paintings offered a lovely respite from the ugliness and stress of modern day living. Like Katarzyna said, "he expressed and defined himself, and was successful."

WOW! Personally, I admire an artist who is confident enough to follow his/her own path, regardless of what is "popular" at the time, or what others say!


Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Anon said, "The consensus was reached, the "people" obviously loved Kincaid. Thinking in political terms, does that mean that the consensus is correct?" Now that is an interesting approach to this. What do YOU think?

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Gina -- you said, ""Christian based paintings of light; no one is going to criticize artwork with a slight religious theme, and it's pretty and there's nothing to figure out. What the heck, go for it.""...

Depends on the crowd, if you will. Slight religious themes, depending on the religion, result in instant harsh criticism from some circles of the art world. For example, you won't find many examples of positive Christian themes in contemporary art in the Chelsea circles of the art world. Artists who hint at that theme are heckled or worse (just because of that theme)... while artists exploring themes of other religions tend to be patted on the back.

Point-blank, the NY based artist who explores Christian themes in a positive way (even if just slightly) will likely be ridiculed for that choice... I've seen artists who happen to be Christian called 'backward', 'ignorant' or worse... just because his or her religious preference is known. On the other hand, the NY based artist exploring positive Muslim themes, for example, will likely be treated with tolerance/respect for his or her religious preference. Heck, he or she may land an exhibit just for focusing on those themes.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Gina -- You make several good points. I've been keeping an eye on what a few mainstream art critics have said about Kinkade in general (several won't even acknowledge him as an artist)since his death. I will be posting about that soon (waiting to see how many others contradict what they have said about other artists). The death of Kinkade has really shown the division within our overall world of art, if you will.

Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Brian:

I agree with you 100 percent on your suggestion to Gina that acceptance of certain art themes depends on the crowd! "Traditional" Christian themed paintings can bring out intolerance, anger and ridicule from people who are not into that way of believing. Same goes for other beliefs as well.

At the risk of showing my "ignorance" (:

I read ANON's comment several times. I'm not sure what he/she means? No one else responded yet either. I wish ANON would explain a bit more. For myself, I avoid the "politics" involved in
the art world as much as possible. Of course, I'm influenced by what others do/say to some degree, as we all are, but I tend to try and follow my "star" and not focus too much on what is supposed to be THE RIGHT WAY because the "experts" in the field tell me that's the way it is. But I'm not sure that is what
ANON is even talking about??? Sounds like you know, by your comment that it's an interesting approach?

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Marsha -- I think (Note: I may be totally wrong) that Anon meant that Kinkade fans tend to have specific values from a social standpoint -- which is reflected in political preference... and thus, what they 'like' art-wise. The same could be said of the NY gallery scene -- specific values dominate that sub-culture, if you will. That said, Kinkade's values -- expressed visually -- clearly reached a solid portion of the public overall.

The fact that Kinkade secured that HUGE fan base -- and reaped the financial rewards from that 'cultivation'(in the millions) -- shows that those values (the social values associated with his images) have more footing in society -- overall -- than other circles of the art world (market) want to admit.

Anon -- perhaps you can clarify?

Jan
via faso.com
Well, the proponents of the NY art scene consider themselves above and apart from the rest of humanity, and truly don't CARE what the rest of humanity thinks.... really rather a sociopathology. I do agree that the numbers speak for themselves, and that most of the country would rather have art that evokes a positive emotion or perhaps a positive spiritual one. That said, why does the NY art scene consider, nay demand that THEY are the arbiters of what is and is not art, then? Why are there not art movements in the middle of the country? Or are there, and they just go about their business and don't have a need to trumpet their own self importance?

Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Brian, Thanks - that makes perfect sense to me. I agree. Yes, maybe ANON can verify? (:

I don't know when Mr. Kinkade's autopsy is supposed to be completed? It will be interesting to see what is found. I suspect
Kinkade was depressed, based on events in his past, and what he was dealing with recently. I hope they don't find that he took his own life.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Jan -- The NY gallery scene is well-funded and connected... which leads to more opportunities for artists represented by specific galleries in that scene. You can buy reach... some of those galleries do just that.

Furthermore, if you look at the background of your average museum director... you will find that most have NY connections... professional backgrounds, and so on. There is something to be said for elbow-rubbing.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Marsha -- I should have said social preference as well. I think the big time art world loathes the fact that an art lover may enjoy a happy cottage over a work that, for example, explores lesbian struggles.

Anon -- I really do want to know what you meant. My interpretation may be off.

As for Kinkade's autopsy -- I've noticed that the 'he faked his death' theories are starting to pop up. LOL

Sam Thorp
via faso.com
I'm sorry... what exactly are we suposed to learn form Kinkade?
Subjugating your personal truth to appeal to the lowest common denominator? Exploiting peoples religious beliefs to make a buck? Declaring bankruptcy to avoid responsibility. Oh wait, the one sentence about personal persona and alternative spaces. That's it; the one sentence? Cult of personality and alternative spaces.... right. Check. Cause, we could not have learned that from anywhere else in the art world.
He was never an up front business man or an honest artist. He was never sincere in his subject matter or sales pitch. The more money he made the more he was corrupted.
You want to make better art? You want to be a better artist? Start by being honest.

Connie
via faso.com
By now most know that he did not die of "natural causes" but alcoholism. According to his brother, some of Thomas's inner demons stemmed from the dismissive attitude of the serious critics toward his work. "As much as he said it didn't bother him, in his heart deep down inside it would sadden him that people would criticize so hatefully his work and his vision when people didn't understand him." I'd like to know what it was "people" didn't understand. He wanted to be respected as a painter while producing schlock. He made financial success his priority and was not happy when he achieved it. Maybe there is also a lesson in that? I pretty much agree with Sam.


Flavia Eckholm
via faso.com
Whatever you think of Kinkade's message in his art work or the NY art scene, they have one thing in common; they both impacted the way art is seen in todays world. Kinkade gave his clients the warm, fuzzy images in which they wanted to see the world, while NY tries to influence their clients to see the world from their lofty, if sometimes cold perspective. Either camp gives today's artists the ability to see the market from two extremes. Kinkade was no Norman Rockwell, who portrayed his subjects with a little humorous irony disguised as political neutrality. Kinkade implied a certain condescension by idealizing even the most perfect of circumstances for a profit incentive. NY puts a higher price tag on work looking down at buyers than Kincade did to do the same thing. The instructive part of this is to see that from both extremes; there are points to be made all along the fulcrum. Maybe from the middle, we should be comforted to know that there are more methods today to bring people to understand what we do and to find an audience from which our viewing public doesn't have to be talked down or to be talked into buying our work. There is room for all of us at the same table. I wonder if that is discomforting to the NY scene?


Sandy Askey-Adams
via faso.com
Brian...

Nicely written article about Kinkade.

Besides being a successful artist and art marketer of his work, he had his demons of torture that he was trying to manage also. just like some of us.
He did not like the bad critique of his work...and he received more than his share. Yet he kept on doing what he was doing......
AND he still managed to be probably the most well-known, appreciated artist by those who have purchased his art and those who have been wanting to buy his work. I have friends who have purchased his work and have spent a lot of money on his work. (Thankfully, they bought my work as well as other artists works also.) But, they all thought it was great to own a Kinkade. I suppose now they are trying to figure out what those paintings are worth since he has passed away.

I suspect there were many who were shocked upon hearing of his death, and at such a young age. Who would have expected that?
It is a bitter sweet story, for sure, of Thomas Kinkade. Oh, and how many artists of the past were scorned for what they were painting and how they were painting.... and today are raised up high.

He will be missed. I think he painted what he thought the public wanted (They were his buyers) and could have done other work if he had wished to really, really please his critics.

Heck, I was thinking the other day,,,, wondering if when he reached those gates to Heaven only to discover that many of his paintings looked like Heaven. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. :) I think that is what many of the buyers of his artwork were looking for. Oh well.

Sandy

mimi
via faso.com
thank you. I think he deserves respect.
When my stepfather bought me a Thomas Kincade calendar a few years ago, I suppressed a giggle and enjoyed it every single month. I asked for a calendar with art on it for Christmas, and that's what he considered art. Good enough for me.

Kathy Chin
via faso.com
Big confession...I'm not sorry to say that I liked his work. Okay, so you all might not like me any more, but independently I liked his work without folks telling me that it was schlock and that I should disapprove and dislike it. The artwork felt warm and inviting and touched something inside me...something emotional not technical (some say they don't like his work because of the technical imperfections.) Whatever...I may be barred from FASO, but more power to him for selling his artwork for money...a lot of money...
I don't know all the details about what he did or didn't do cause I was not privy to any of it, but I give him props for how he made millions of people feel!

mimi
via faso.com
Kathy that's exactly my point. He was an artist. He made beautiful art that millions loved. How many of us can say THAT??

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Flavia -- You said, "There is room for all of us at the same table. I wonder if that is discomforting to the NY scene?". Market-wise... it takes them out of their comfort zone.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Kathy -- You won't be 'barred from FASO' for having an opinion. This isn't Hyperallergic or Modern Art Notes -- or any of the other art blogs I've been banned from... LOL

Roxanne Roach
via faso.com
Never say die, I admire Kincaid's fortitude in getting his art in the mainstream. I so agree that if you have what people want as art to view and take pleasure in, then there is value in the beauty of that alone.

Nancy Riedell
via faso.com
Brian, I live not too far from Thomas Kincaide and have heard over the years the alcoholic rampages he went on and the poor way employees were treated who were hired to paint his works. I've never been a fan of his work and frankly, don't think he's that great of an artist. But I have to wholeheartedly agree with you - he was a master marketer of his art. May he rest in peace.

Betty Pieper
via faso.com
For a long time people in general felt that anything that was an original oil painting was fine art. Even stuff imported years ago from Chinese sweat shops that was purchased at one day "limited" shows before hitting another town like a traveling circus! When shown, friends ohhed and ahhed. Kinkade was in the right place at the right time to take full advantage of the masses who could not tell his offerings from what they glanced at fleetingly when they were dragged to museums. It suprises me to hear people now saying how much they loved and cherished his products. Even though I loathed it as artificially sweet, I have been listening. I still think he set critical thinking about art back a century. Yesterday I repainted a work titled Southwest Sunset and Railroad Trestle and put in some big light as a nod to the departed. A Posthumous Nod to Thomas Kinkade. I hope he went safely through the ultimate white tunnel and to the Light. I hope he is happy in heaven. If I get there and he tries to enlist me as a highlighter in defiance of my expressionist heart I will KNOW we are in the other place. And he will be consigned to paint like me and I will be consigned to paint like him - and that would be Artist Hell.

Kay
via faso.com
I was never a fan but who can deny his marketing genius ??I often wondered if he painted big sweeping
abstracts in secret..wonder what will be found...

Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Connie:

You said "according to Kinkade's brother, some of his inner demons stemmed from the dismissive attitudes of the critics, and also he was affected over time by the people who would hatefully criticize his work and vision." I must say, I suspected that? So sad!! I don't know much about alcoholism, but I believe it usually stems from a deep inner frustration and low self esteem?
I never kept up with events surrounding Kinkade's life. I just knew that millions loved what he painted. Others did not. I sometimes heard about the trouble he eventually got into. I also
know the media tends to love a juicy story and can stir up a real mess if they so choose, so unless I have all the facts, I guess I tend to give someone the benefit of the doubt? One message I will take away from his death is to remember, as Kinkade proved, there is no ONE RIGHT WAY to paint. We each must decide what is the right path for us to follow.




Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Sam:

Would you clarify something for me? "Subjugating your personal truth to appeal to the Lowest common denominator."

Who, or what, IS the "lowest common denominator?"



Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
I must say that the reaction from mainstream art critics fascinates me. A little update if you desire to read -- What the death of Thomas Kinkade has revealed about mainstream art critics - Part 1 by Brian Sherwin http://faso.com/fineartviews/42756/what-the-death-of-thomas-kinkade-has-revealed-about-mainstream-art-critics-part-1

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Nancy -- I don't think he was a 'great' artist... just to be clear. I personally don't like his work. He WAS an artist though. He was certainly a great marketer.

Some of my fellow writers imply that an artist is not an artist if you don't agree with the visual message. That is one of the debates his death has re-fueled, if you will. Jerry Saltz has stated that Kinkade was not an artist... that he was just a painter. I say... you are an artist if you are painter -- deal with it. :P

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Betty -- Artist Hell, in my opinion, would be the lack of whatever material you use and the inability to create anything. ;p Someone DO that... an entire series on what Hell would be for an artist.

Jan
via faso.com
Brian - you may want to spell check the first line in the fourth paragraph of the additional article you posted about Kincade and critics.... just sayin

Katarzyna Lappin
via faso.com
Jan,
I believe the right spelling is "Kinkade" not "Kincade"...




Jan
via faso.com
I was referring to Brian's other article.... yes, I misspelled Kinkade - the misspelled word in the other article should be "public" and that's not what's there.....

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Jan -- LOL Oops... Saltz must be rubbing off on me. LOL

jo allebach
via faso.com
I wouldn't mind the money or having so many people like and buy my work. It would be rather discourgaing to be dissed about it though. I think his paintings are kinda over kill on the sweet fairy tale look right or wrong but it obviously made a connection with a lot of people. I think I will keep painting the way I am going and hope for the best.
It is sad when someone so young dies especially of "natural causes".
Good article and very interesting comments.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Kay -- I've been thinking about that as well... it would be a trip if it turns out he had a hidden series of paintings. It is not that uncommon for an artist to have private work... maybe he did.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Jo -- I'd like to know if he had a hired marketing team... or if it was all on his charge, if you will. I've been told he had a marketing team -- but I'm not sure what role was served... or for how long he had people under his employ. That -- and other areas of his business career -- is where other artists can learn a few things. And yes, I know he got into some trouble business-wise... but it was not all negative.

I'm actually interested in learning more about the man... at least the details of his marketing approach over the years and how it has changed.... and so on.

Marsha McDonald
via faso.com
Brian:

What I don't understand is if he did do other pieces, and enjoyed doing them, why didn't he try to market those as well? If he was concerned that his client base would not approve of a different direction, then he could have used another name. Artists have certainly done that before. As many artists learn when they become very successful, most galleries and clients put pressure on them to keep doing the same thing over and over. Zero tolerance for experimentation and growth for the artist at that point! The artist then has to make a decision whether to "break out of the box" and paint what THEY want to, or continue painting to please others. Well, I, too, am looking forward to knowing more about Mr. Kinkade.

Also, I loved your article to the critics!!

Sharon Weaver
via faso.com
The fact that Kinkade was talented is true. He made the decision to change direction and go the commercial route. Many artists sell out but there was something else about Kinkade that drove him out of the establishment. He was the first artist to break out of the power structure that galleries and dealers wielded over artist. At the time it was unheard of for an artist to do this. Today with the internet, websites etc. not so unusual.

Betty Pieper
via faso.com
Brian..off topic and maybe not...Did you write anything on the passing of the "conservative" art critic Hilton Kramer?? At the Times before perhaps you were born...You so often confront
Jerry Saltz...I wondered what you thought of H.K.
I don't know what he in turn thought of Kinkade..

gina agrav
via faso.com
Wow, a lot of interesting commentary. I just wanted to comment on my writing a few days back regarding the religious aspect. I need to clarify; perhaps it's WHATEVER religious aspect you choose to run with. People are uncomfortable commenting (at least to your face) that they have a problem with your work having these undertones.

anon
via faso.com
I'm a politically oriented person, who believes that there is no aspect to our lives that isn't affected by politics. When I read the article, and saw the comments, I just wondered what people thought about the facts that Kinkaid was popular, successful, wealthy, loved by the masses, and yet his work didn't seem to have status in the arts community. I didn't know that he was conservative. Sometimes I feel that many "run with the herd" and get some kind of reassurance that we're correct. I guess I was asking "Does popularity in any political arena mean anything?" Because Kinkaid had popularity of the masses. I guess it was more of a rhetorical question intended to find out what people thought. Thanks Brian!

Jacqueline
via faso.com
After reading all of these comments through, it is apparent to me that there are no black and white answers; just lots of questions unaswered (grey areas). : )
Questions; Is the NY art scene (critics etc) looking more for the artist that stands out in the crowd, and promoting them while other artists like Kinkade stand out because they appeal more to the masses? (And why does Kinkade-type art appeal to the masses)? Which leads me to ask; do these two examples just represent two different ways of marketing? - One is marketing to the masses while the other is marketing to the wealthy.

I also wonder that if Kinkade was allegedly so upset about how he was treated by these critics, then why did he not change his art to comply more to their standards? Does that mean that he had more than money invested in his style of work? I guess that is possible and maybe he was more depressed about the system in general? It is too bad we can't ask Kinkade now!
Brian; you are very good at bringing interesting topics to the discussion table!

mimi
via faso.com
why should he change his art to appease critics?
He had to be laughing all the way to the bank!

Jan
via faso.com
Mimi - he had filed chapter 11 a few years back. Not knowing the details, I am sure that it was because of the lawsuits filed against him for fraud by his dealer network, a dropoff in interest in his work, and his impending divorce. All the way to the bank? I think he was in over his neck.


Kim
via faso.com
Hey, if you can market faith, why not, right? It's America.

Sharon Marston
via faso.com
I hope that my art will someday be able to touch as many lives as Kinkade has. He made art, expressed himself and was a marketing genius. I strive to be more like him. RIP

Sandy Askey-Adams
via faso.com
Nicely said Sharon. It is true, I think that any one of us would want to have the following that he had along with his marketing genius.
He was blessed.

Darrell Dalton
via faso.com
Any artist would envey what Thomas Kinkade has done. It seems to me the head of envey, has resin it ugly head. He has done what other artist and critics couldn't do, painted his way and without bowing down to critics who don't get it and will never get it.

Carol Schmauder
via faso.com
Thanks for the article, Brian. Many may not like the works of Kincade, but you have to admire his marketing abilities.

Nina Allen Freeman
via faso.com
Interesting subject! Ya'll have been talking for a week while I have been at a workshop. Kincade knew how to be a great artist, I think, but chose to paint the same themes of the dear cottage with the lighted window and the path over and over again because he knew they appealed to a large number of people who like sentimentality. His genius was in marketing. I don't know if he ever share his knowledge about this in books or articles - that would have been nice. He left so much of his work, I wonder about it's value, but then they said the same thing about Norman Rockwell too. In years to come we may see exhibits of Kincade originals kept locked away somewhere.

Tine Buma
via faso.com
Nina might just have it right! Keep your Kinkade's!










 

FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database

 

FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved