Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life

Blog


« David Tanner - fresh approach to portraiture | Main | Gregory Mortenson - distinguishing character studies »


Follow this Blog



Subscribe to our Newsletter



Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip

 

Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

















abstract art
acrylic painting
advice for artists
art and culture
art and psychology
art and society
art appreciation
art blogging advice
Art Business
art challenge
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art fairs
art forum
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art website design
art website tips
art websites
Art World
art world problems
artist resume advice
artist statement
artist tribute
artist website tips
artist websites
assemblage
BoldBrush
BoldBrush Interview
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
BrushBuzz
Canvoo
Carolyn Henderson
Carrie Turner
cityscape painting
Clint Watson
collage
colored pencil
conceptual art
Connie Tom
copyright
creativity
Daniel Keys
Dealing with art forgery
Deber Klein
digital art
drawing
email newsletters
encaustic painting
etching
exhibiting art online
exposure tips
Facebook
FASO
FASO Art News
FASO Daily Art Show
FASO Featured Artists
figure painting
FineArtViews
FineArtViews Interview Series
functional art
Gayle Faucette Wisbon
glass art
Google
Guest Posts
Holiday
InformedCollector
inspiration
installation art
Instruction
Jack White
Keith Bond
landscape painting
Linda Mikulich
Lisa Call
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Matthew Mahler
mixed media
Moshe Mikanovsky
oil painting
online art competitions
online art groups
originality
painting
pastel
photography
Pinterest
plein air painting
politics
portraits
pricing artwork
realism
religion
Robert Genn
Sarah Maple
sculpting
sculpture
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
social networking
still life art
street art
support local art
Think Tank
tips for exhibiting art
Twitter
watercolor
watermarks
websites for artists
wildlife art




 Archives:May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sep 2012
Aug 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Apr 2012
Mar 2012
Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005

 

The Art4Love Scandal Widens: Artists are not the only victims of Chad Love Lieberman

by Brian Sherwin on 8/30/2011 3:14:21 PM

This article is by Brian Sherwin, regular contributing writer for FineArtViews. Brian Sherwin is an art critic, blogger, curator, artist and writer based near Chicago, Illinois. He has been published in Hi Fructose Magazine, Illinois Times, and other publications, and linked to by publications such as The Huffington Post, The Boston Globe, Juxtapoz Magazine, Deutsche Bank ArtMag, ARTLURKER, Myartspace, Blabbermouth, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Modern Art Obsession, Citizen LA, Shark Forum, Two Coats of Paint, Vandalog and Art Fag City. Disclaimer: This author's views are entirely his/her own and may not reflect the views of BoldBrush, Inc. You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.


In researching the Art4Love scandal -- and the confusion surrounding the story --I have discovered several key facts. For example, many originally thought that Art4Love's founder -- Chad Love Lieberman -- was an alias of Craig Pravda. According to Pravda's ex -- who asked to remain anonymous -- the two are not the same person. In fact, she described them as good friends and business partners. I have discovered that many of the business partnerships that Art4Love has claimed to have in the past are fraudulent claims. In other words, Art4Love released unauthorized press releases involving companies that in reality had no real connection to Art4Love Inc.,. Digging deeper I have discovered that some of the direct business associations that Chad Love Lieberman has claimed to have are in fact false.

 

Based on a StockPhotoTalk blog post from 2006 and an Art4Love press release it appears that Chad Love Lieberman had claimed to have a direct business connection with Jerry Tavin -- founder of the Young Photographers Alliance (YBA) and former CEO of nonstock. Due to the sketchy claims I had discovered concerning Mr. Love Lieberman I decided to contact Mr. Tavin in order to find out if he really served on Art4Love's advisory council and if he did in fact have other business relations with Art4Love. Needless to say, I was not surprised when Jerry Tavin verified that Chad Love Lieberman's claims were false.

 

Jerry Tavin informed me that he did have a conversation with Chad Love Lieberman "many years ago" pertaining to Love Lieberman's request to represent his stock photo company on Art4Love. Of the conversation Tavin stated, "I saw fit to never finalize any agreement and I have never heard from them since.". Tavin also made it clear to me that the claims that he had served on Art4Love's advisory council are false. Tavin said, "I have never been on their advisory board and I have never participated in any meetings related to Art4Love's business affairs.". Once again, it appears that Love Lieberman published unauthorized press releases, including bogus quotes, about business arrangements that never happened.

 

I asked Mr. Tavin how he felt learning that Chad Love Lieberman had used his name to support Art4Love in a fraudulent manner. Tavin responded, "This is a first ever in my long business life and of course it is disturbing.". Tavin added, "I am also concerned about how this false information will affect my foundation since it has been built on my reputation and constantly requires support in order to stay alive. If the young photographers and the professionals back off because of these statements we will not be able to survive, so it is not just about me.". When asked about the Art4Love scandal in general, Jerry Tavin stated, "I am saddened and angry that they (Art4Love) may have abused the rights of artists.".

 

Jerry Tavin also took the time to clear the name of Jeffrey Burke, former acting President of the Picture Archive Council of America (PACA), who was mentioned in the same press release. As I previously reported, an Art4Love press release claims that Burke, President and CEO of PictureArts, praised Art4Love and the business arrangement forged between the two companies. That partnership never happened -- and the quotes attributed to Jeffrey Burke were never spoken.

 

Tavin explained, "I did tell Jeff about Art4Love in reference only to what their company was proposing to do in the marketplace.". He continued, "Jeff and his company Picture Arts have an excellent reputation in the stock photography field. With humility I can say the same about my company nonstock and about my own reputation in the industry.". He added, "Chad came across as another vendor I was not aware of the kind of person I was dealing with, If I did he would not have gotten into my door.". Jerry Tavin made it clear that the interaction never went any further than that.

 

When asked about his opinion of Chad Love Lieberman and Art4Love, Jerry Tavin stated, "I abhor Chad's alleged actions to perpetrate frauds on artists' rights and I abhor his use of the names of innocent parties to further his own reprehensible interests.". He added, "I'm shocked about this horror story. Of course it needs to be exposed but it is sad that innocent people are dragged in through Chad's callous use of our names.". He made it clear that he appreciated the fact that I'm trying my best to get to the bottom of this story -- and clear names in the process. Chad Love Lieberman clearly has some explaining to do.

 

Take care, Stay true,

 

Brian Sherwin



[Services:
FASO: Want Your Art Career to Grow?  Set up an Artist Website with FASO.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $6,000 in awards. 

Daily Art Show: Daily Show of Art that reaches thousands of potential collectors.

Backstory: About Clint. Email Editor.  Submit a guest post.  Twitter. Republish. ]


Related Posts:

Art4Love Copyright Infringement Scandal: Chad Love-Lieberman - Art Scam King?

Art4Love Scandal Update: The strange tale of Art4Love, Chad Love-Lieberman and Craig Pravda

Copyright Registration: Protecting Yourself as Well as Your Collectors

Fallout from the Art4Love scandal: Does the scandal change the way you view art prints that are sold on commercial art sites?

What Artists should learn from the Art4Love Scandal: Busting the myths of copyright infringement Part 3 -- Public Domain


Topics: art law | Brian Sherwin | copyright | FineArtViews | selling art online 

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 23 Comments

Sari
via faso.com
http://www.yudkin.com/markmin.htm Marcia Yudkin, of The Marketing Minute, addresses copyright infringement and controlling your material in today's post called "Control your Bait"...Link to how to file a DMCA is there too...

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Sari -- the DMCA has pitfalls though. I agree that more artists need to be aware about how to file in order to protect their own copyright. However, I also think more needs to be done to allow people other than just the copyright owner protect copyrighted images on art websites in general. I'll be hitting on that soon with a FineArtViews article.

What is your opinion of Art4Love and this scandal?

Sari
via faso.com
Ugh...Honestly? Excuse my french, but UNf-ckingbelievable...(can't think of the polite word)...
My delay in responding is because I was scrolling through the images to see if anything of mine was there...
My next thought is of watermarking...Initially, I used to watermark, but after reading a blog post on artbizblog.com I stopped using them...
Now I have an urge to put big watermarks over the middle of everything online...
Wouldn't a watermark prevent this kind of thing? What do you think about watermarking?

Sari
via faso.com
In the interim, possibly based on fear of this happening to me, I researched and bought a program to watermark my photos in iPhoto... http://bluecrowbar.com/impression/ This thing is called Impression for iPhoto(cost me $14.99) and it watermarks easily and copies rather than replacing an image file...I am now changing up my images online for these... For non-Mac users there is PicMarkr Pro which replaces your Flickr photos with a watermarked image for you...The free version of PicMarkr works online for Macs but it is a little slow...

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Sari -- Actually digital watermarks offer little protection if someone really wants your images. In fact, some of the images that ended up on deviantART were watermarked with deviantART's watermark feature.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
LOL I meant, some of the images that ended up on Art4Love were watermarked on deviantART.

Sari
via faso.com
What I find interesting is DeviantArt's watermark feature is an add-on on their site, a checkmark box you check when uploading your work...So the image is not integral with the watermark...What I mean to say is-if images watermarked through DeviantArt ended up on Art4Love, then that looks like an inside job(because DeviantArt would have access to the original image)...If images were watermarked by the artist before uploading, and then appropriated that is different-but I bet that didn't happen?

Phil Kendall
via faso.com
I guess you just have to get real and get over it.

You post some images [of your art] on your website. Someone sees it and invites you to join their organisation as it will do both your art and your art career good. You overlook, in blissful ignorance, the fact it's about them and not you.

Pandora's box is open your images are there in the great blue yonder for all to manipulate and call their own. Get over it and get pass it too.

Yes they knowingly abuse copyright knowing that by the time you discover it their smart marketing has made a good income for them.

They know that you do not have sufficient funds to contest their abuse of your images...

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Sari -- Not sure about the inside job theory. As for watermarks... with enough skill someone can remove it and replace the part of the image that is missing. I don't know much about Photoshop and all that... but my guess is that it would not be that hard to do.

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Phil -- I don't know about the UK... but in the US if the artist had the images registered before copyright the infringer is stuck with the legal fees once everything is said and done... that is IF the judge sides with the copyright owner.

Sari
via faso.com
Brian- an integral watermark requires some artistry to remove, although doable, I don't think integrally watermarked pieces were doctored or altered then used...Far more likely is that the original images were just taken from the Deviant site, since they were there already- the watermark option on the Deviant site was just a layover- I checked their forums on that...and as you know, the overwhelming majority of art related crime is insider's work...I think the fact that Deviant had access to the original images, while an outsider could only get watermarked images (those that were), indicates some inner problems or collusion with someone at Deviant...It wouldn't be surprising, including what you were saying about Deviant (ethically)...

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Sari -- the criticism I have for deviantART is the same that I have for most commercial art sites in general. That being that potential infringement by site users is extremely common. I do think that deviantART, as an industry leader, could do more to set a standard in that regard.

Yes, I do think that more should be done by commercial art sites in regard to reviewing images that are listed as a prints for sell. However, my gut tells me this was not an inside job as you are suggesting.

Having spoke to deviantART employees in the past I'd say there are too many checks and balances within their team for an employee to pull something like that off. Someone would have likely caught it -- and anyone in their right mind working for deviantART would know not to attempt something like that. DeviantART is a multimillion dollar business -- any employee doing something like that would be facing major heat from deviantART's legal team.

I'm more apt to think that 1.) buyers on Art4Love never received their prints and are victims as well. 2.) as others have suggested, they could have bought prints from sites like deviantART in order to sell them as their own -- which, if that is the case, would be a violation of deviantART policy.


Sari
via faso.com
Honestly Brian, Just looking at the forest, this is what I see...
The wikipedia entry for DeviantArt states that two of the original founders are no longer with the company...One Scott Jarkoff in 2005...The other Matthew Stephens in 2003...
Still just looking at the forest...Two guys seem to be implicated in the Art4Love thing...Chad Love Lieberman and Craig Pravda...
DeviantArt began in 2000...Art4LOve 1999...Deviant location Hollywood, California, where people change their names with their drink order...
I'm not looking at the trees, because I am not close enough...But my gut says, two smart programmer engineer guys left one company badly and now two smart engineer guys are stealing from that company? Ho hum...Methinks they are the same...p.s. and who names a company Deviant(if they are not)? (just saying...)


Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Sari -- I know of Scott Jarkoff... one of the three deviantART founders. I've communicated with him online a few times through the years -- and informed him of this scandal. Trust me -- those two had nothing to do with this. Furthermore, my understanding is that the two still have stock in the company -- considering how much deviantART is worth I highly doubt they would want to risk that.

As for Chad Love Lieberman and Craig Pravda... they are both very real. I covered that in an article recently -- actually communicated with an ex of Pravda's who offered a world of information about the two.

I know your intentions are good -- but one thing we have to be careful of is pointing fingers blindly. Several innocent people have already had fingers pointed at them -- and I've been doing my best to clear names.

Sari
via faso.com
Funny...If you take a look at a photo of Scott Jarkoff the founder of DeviantArt, then look at a photo of Craig Pravda, the Mark your Spot guy, you will notice the same sticking out ears, the same extra large chin, the same thinning hair, the slightly Russian style...
The photo of Matthew Stephens the other DeviantArt founder, is eerily similar to the Chad Love Lieberman(Art4LOve) photos...Egg shaped face, receding hairline, normal nose...
My fingers are not entirely blind- as an artist I am an expert at seeing geometrical shapes and similarities...
Not sure that "knowing of" somebody is the same as looking at them face to face...The fact that they still have stock in the company is moot-in the art business, art crime occurs daily where the perpetrators are part of the same company they are stealing from-it is not an alibi...
I still think this is an inside job...It's too big and too familiar and too complex to be an outsider...I'll trust my instincts first...

Phil Kendall
via faso.com
Hi Brian. UK Copyright? You just sign and date it...no registration required. The copyright is actually created with the painting.

Those that infringe copyright just know that the little people, like artists, just do not have either the money or time or the legal team to fight for their rights in a court of law but those infringer's have the money!

Sari
via faso.com
Ugh...Don't even bother answering my previous post...Angelo Sotira's photo (DeviantArt owner) looks exactly like the other ones...Everyone's pics looks the same...The DeviantArt owners past and present, the Art4Love guy, the Mark your Spot guy- all look-alikes...It's like a multiple personality disorder game- all the same person- different aliases...Truly Deviant and appropriate...Which is why I wouldn't sign up with a company called Deviant, nor from looking at the works there-truly a mash-up of plagiarized digitally copied and pasted 'I have no idea what it is or where it came from' works...

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Phil -- Copyright exists at the time of creation in the US as well. However, you have to register it if you want the full legal force of copyright.

Steve
via faso.com
Hi Brian, after reading about the Art4love scandal,I thought you might be interested in hearing what happened to my copyright infringement.
Last spring I googled my (name, artist) to see how I was ranked and as I scrolled down the list I noticed my name on MySpace of which I'm not a member. But there I was with a photo of myself, several of my copyrighted images, and my art statement with added on comments by someone who was impersonating me.
Apparently they took all of the above off of myartspace.com where I have shown my work for a number of years, and basically had stolen my identity at least from Nov. 2008. I filed a complaint with the local police, the Attorney General and the FBI looked at it and all agreed that it was a case of identity theft. I ended up asking the Consumer Protection office for help and after they contacted MySpace, the page was taken down.
But MySpace refused to identify who the impostor was and basically they just got a warning. I'm still considering taking legal action against MySpace and the impostor because I feel these social networks should take responsibility for people's actions who use their site.
Your comments would be appreciated.......Steve

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Steve -- As you may know I used to work for Myartspace. Did you let Myartspace know? As for Myspace's reaction... they most likely did what was expected of them according to the DMCA. However, I think sites, in general, could do more to help artists to defend their copyright. After all, would it have really hurt Myspace to inform you, the copyright owner, of contact information for the infringer? I don't think so. I do think that social networking site -- be they art sites or other -- need to take more responsibility.

Steve Engle
via faso.com
Hi Brian, thanks for replying to my email about copyright infringement on Myspace.
I just read your latest about Art4Love--frankly I would love to take to court whoever stole my identity and my copyrighted images, but I thought since I couldn't prove loss of income, I couldn't sue for damages--and I've read most, if not all of the info on copyright.
So now after reading your latest posting, it would seem I could sue--1. Myspace to force them to reveal the identity of the impostor and also 2. The impostor/infringer.
I have contacted a lawyer in my area (who was recommended by Montana Legal Service) but they didn't even have the courtesy to return my call. Any ideas on how to pursue this further?
Thanks, Steve Engle

Brian Sherwin
via faso.com
Steve -- Look up DMCA.

Steve Engle
via faso.com
Hi Brian, I did take your suggestion last Sept. and looked up the DMCA in regards to copyright infringement concerning artists work.
After reading through it, it seemed to me that it wasn't possible to legally hold social websites liable for what their members posted--as in my case of I.D. theft and copyright infringement from my artists page on MyArtSpace.com
I also contacted myartspace twice about this issue and each time they said that Brian Sherwin would get in touch with me.......it's been two months now and not a word.
You have been the only one I've contacted since last Spring who has given me any meaningful feedback and I thank you for it.
Steve










 

FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database

 

FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved