Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life

Blog


« Tell Me a Story: Prominence | Main | Selected Upcoming Exhibits by Informed Collector Artists »


Follow this Blog



Subscribe to our Newsletter



Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip

 

Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

















abstract art
acrylic painting
advice for artists
art and culture
art and psychology
art and society
art appreciation
art blogging advice
Art Business
art challenge
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art fairs
art forum
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art website design
art website tips
art websites
Art World
art world problems
artist resume advice
artist statement
artist tribute
artist website tips
artist websites
assemblage
BoldBrush
BoldBrush Interview
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
BrushBuzz
Canvoo
Carolyn Henderson
Carrie Turner
cityscape painting
Clint Watson
collage
colored pencil
conceptual art
Connie Tom
copyright
creativity
Daniel Keys
Dealing with art forgery
Deber Klein
digital art
drawing
email newsletters
encaustic painting
etching
exhibiting art online
exposure tips
Facebook
FASO
FASO Art News
FASO Daily Art Show
FASO Featured Artists
figure painting
FineArtViews
FineArtViews Interview Series
functional art
Gayle Faucette Wisbon
glass art
Google
Guest Posts
Holiday
InformedCollector
inspiration
installation art
Instruction
Internet Scams
Jack White
Keith Bond
landscape painting
Linda Mikulich
Lisa Call
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Matthew Mahler
mixed media
Moshe Mikanovsky
oil painting
online art competitions
online art groups
originality
painting
pastel
photography
Pinterest
plein air painting
politics
portraits
pottery
pricing artwork
printmaking
realism
religion
Robert Genn
Sarah Maple
sculpting
sculpture
seascape
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
social networking
still life art
street art
support local art
Think Tank
tips for exhibiting art
Twitter
watercolor
watermarks
websites for artists
western art
wildlife art




 Archives:Sep 2014
Aug 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
Apr 2014
Mar 2014
Feb 2014
Jan 2014
Dec 2013
Nov 2013
Oct 2013
Sep 2013
Aug 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sep 2012
Aug 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Apr 2012
Mar 2012
Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005

 

FineArtViews Interview: Kathryn Born -- Editor-in-Chief of Chicago Art Magazine

by Brian Sherwin on 8/18/2011 10:34:03 AM

This article is by Brian Sherwin, regular contributing writer for FineArtViews. Brian Sherwin is an art critic, blogger, curator, artist and writer based near Chicago, Illinois. He has been published in Hi Fructose Magazine, Illinois Times, and other publications, and linked to by publications such as The Huffington Post, The Boston Globe, Juxtapoz Magazine, Deutsche Bank ArtMag, ARTLURKER, Myartspace, Blabbermouth, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Modern Art Obsession, Citizen LA, Shark Forum, Two Coats of Paint and Art Fag City. You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.


Kathryn Born is the Editor-in-Chief of Chicago Art Magazine -- a site that offers Chicago art news, reviews and features... and various information about Chicago artists and Chicago art galleries. Born founded Chicago Art Magazine after "pounding around" as a Chicago-based filmmaker, artist and writer for 15 years. The site is part of a network that includes Chicago-based websites such as Chicago Art Map and Chicago Art Collection.  Chicago Art Magazine began as part of Art Talk Chicago -- a Chicago Tribune sponsored blog network -- and became an independent venture in the fall of 2009. The collective of art sites are a perfect example of what artists can do to help support art in their community.

 

Brian Sherwin: Kathryn, you are the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Chicago Art Magazine -- which is part of a network of websites dedicated to the arts in Chicago. Can you tell us about the history of the network and why you decided to establish it?

 

Kathryn Born: I have no idea, in retrospect it's all sort of a blur. I remember everyone bitching about the Chicago art scene and if we only had "criticism" it would save the day, turn Chicago into a world class art town. So I guess I wanted to try it out and either prove or dis-prove.

 

Sherwin: And what did you discover? Has art criticism 'saved the day' for the Chicago art scene?

 

Born: Of course the idea that "all we need is solid academic art criticism" turned out to be nonsense, and I have the user analytics to prove the low levels of readership. And obviously, no ecosystem is brought to a new level because of one element. But Chicago is an extremely academic art town, so that's going to be the knee-jerk sentiment – that academia is the center of power, and it can elevate and anoint art stars. I've grown to believe that most people simply want information. Who are the artists? What are they working on? What does it look like? Those are the questions we try to answer by posting curated and straightforward content 3-4 times a week.

 

Sherwin: The Internet has allowed a new breed of art writer to rise up beyond the physical pages of traditional print. Many have noted that we are watching a new direction in art criticism unfold as self-proclaimed art critics and other art writers reach millions combined in the form of social media. Most of the big art-related stories are old news by the time they are mentioned in physical magazines -- having already been picked up by art bloggers and spread virally online. Obviously the art critics/writers of the old guard, if you will, don't always agree that this is good for art criticism and art appreciation overall. What are your thoughts on this?

 

Born: The general debates between the local art critics and myself goes a lot deeper than that. But first I'll dismiss the whole paper issue. I think the recession forced people to "let go" of print, and that issue is closed, to some degree. But the Chicago Art War that goes back 40 years has always been Conceptual vs. Painting. Now, technically no one thinks of it as "conceptual art", nor painting really, but the line is between art that is self-explanatory, as opposed to one that needs an expert to tell the average dope what to think.
Those two types of art have been in direct opposition to each other for decades.

 

Sherwin: So what side does the typical Chicago art critic take?

 

Born: The art critics take the conceptual side because conceptual art is conducive to criticism, (it's a type of art that's always been a symbiotic relationship, as conceptual artists need critics to validate it, and critics could have a free-for-all, coming up with all sort of meanings.) Chicago Art Magazine's been fighting pretty hard on the side of the painters, and other types of art that don't get much attention.

 

For example, we had a great writer come in from Mexico City, and he took it upon himself to make sure we knew about every Latino gallery in Chicago. I'm pro Book Art, Public Art, Street Art, Digital Folk art. I like the local Burning Man group, and feel comfortable covering ceramic arts and plein air painters – and I'll choose that stuff over planks leaning against a wall (accompanied by a 20-page essay) any day.

 

Sherwin: So I take it your opinions are not exactly appreciated among the base of art critics in Chicago -- at least those who support mainstream conceptual art solidly?

 

Born: I hate art speak with a passion, so does Robin Dluzen, our Managing Editor. End result -- the Chicago art critics will hold big hand-wringing panel sessions about art criticism and not invite us. But I've come to peace with this, as Chicago Art Magazine is the largest art magazine in Chicago. We have approximately 80,000 views each month.

 

Sherwin: So it is safe to suggest that you have made some professional enemies over the years?

 

Born: Sure. And quite a few friends. If all the ideas I've mentioned don't adequately explain why I'm not loved by the critical establishment, and why I'm in lock step with Chicago's proud-to-be-an-outcast aesthetic, nothing will.

 

Sherwin: Back to online publishing... as you know, one problem with online publishing-- specifically when art is the focus-- happens to be the issue of funding. As online magazines and art blogs become more ambitious the growth spurred by that ambition often means that some form of funding is needed... be it to improve the website or to pay staff. I understand that you approached-- and solved-- this problem by initiating a countdown to destruction, so to speak.

 

You threatened to shut down the site on 10/10/10 if the site failed to become financially stable. Obviously your challenge worked because Chicago Art Magazine is still going strong. With that in mind can you discuss that history of Chicago Art Magazine and why you decided to take drastic measures? Would you have really shut down the site had the financial expectations not been met?

 

Born: Ha ha. Well, as we always tell artists: "multiple income streams", and that ultimately became the financial answer for the magazine network. But we absolutelyy would have shut down – the staff and writers get paid (a little) and where would the money have come from? But the update I haven't had time to write is that we're subsidized by a few things: one is that I opened a tech magazine (TINC Magazine – tincmag.com) and those guys aren't a bunch of broke hippies eschewing money.

 

Tech is a healthier industry. So the ironic thing is that I couldn't break even (consistently) with an traffic-laden, social media centric, SEO-optimized, Integrated Marketing art magazine, but I could make money teaching other businesses how to grow their web audience using the methods we'd created at the magazine.

 

Sherwin: Can you go into further detail about the lack of support?

 

Born: Someone once said, "never expect the art world to take care of artists", and that's the truth. We couldn't get support from the art galleries, MCA, Art Institute, Columbia College – several of these institutions said our reader demographic simply had too low an income, and (I quote), "the audience we want is big donors."

 

At one point, I was so angry at all of them, we didn't do reviews for a year – just to make a point about their lack of support. But now I'm left with loving art and loving publishing and emotionally attached to the staff of the magazine. I love the idea of a team, and I wouldn't want to write alone. I just sort of forgave the art world for being inept.

 

Sherwin: Big donors are one thing... but the public, overall, is a force to be reckoned with, true? Shouldn't these institutions take the general public more seriously?

 

Born: The art world is changing, and I'm probably the only one who likes the direction it's going. The public is coming; the larger audience we've all been talking about is starting to arrive. But they're leapfrogging high art, and going right to the stuff they intuitively like. Their tastes will improve, but I believe few will go into the deeply conceptual/academic stuff, and that arena will always stay small.

 

The public will want to make their own decisions and be drawn to artwork that has meaning in the work itself, and not the essay behind the desk. Even the professional community is having a "crisis of authority" and don't want to follow what the experts say. People feel very betrayed by experts, whether its economists or politicians, so they're not going to sign up for an authority figure in deciding how to spend their money. Not unless they're spending hundreds of thousands on a piece.

 

Sherwin: Can you tell us about a few artists, art galleries, and art writers from Chicago that you feel people should be keeping an eye on?

 

Born: Too many great artists to mention, I always say Tom Tourmelke because I want him to be a big star. Then public artist, people you never think of like John Adduci, Nick Briz. And then there are people at Pumping Station One Hackerspace knitting with "soft circuits" and hacking Speak and Spells. I'm drawn to things that are really new, genuinely creative and innovate. That's probably why I'm as comfortable reviewing art, along with reviewing an Android app or a business plan. When something makes you say, "Holy crap. That's fucking awesome", you push back the other articles and put it on the top. It's either brilliant and exciting, or it's not.

 

Sherwin: What about core art bloggers from Chicago? For example, when one thinks of art blogging in New York one tends to think of Paddy Johnson, Hrag Vartanian, and Edward Winkleman -- these individuals have made an impact in their community. Who are the bloggers of the Chicago art scene? Can you point us to some Chicago art blogs?

 

Born: I'll give you a small list: Paul Klein – Artletter, Jyoti  Srivastava does a great photoblog, Jason Foumberg isn't a blogger, although the site is Wordpress, Artslant – Abraham Richie and Erik Wenzel are contributors, Art Talk Chicago – Stephanie Burke (owned by the Trib). Interestingly, none of these are really blogs, right? I think the lone art blogger is sort of gone, with Facebook and all. Now it's group art blogs or affiliations with someone else.

 

Sherwin: Back to art writing in general -- do you have any advice for art writers? Specifically those who desire to utilize a blog in order to establish an audience? Any words of wisdom?

 

Born: If no one is reading what you write, say it in a more interesting way, or write about something else.

 

Sherwin: So... in your opinion, is there really a battle gong on between art writing and art criticism? Between, for example, art bloggers and art writers who still work in print?

 

Born: The question isn't about art writing vs. art criticism, but paragraphs vs software. The question I'm asking (and projects I'm consulting on), is studying how we find art, and how we can find art without having to take on art collecting/art appreciation as a hobby. Wealthy professionals simply don't have time to muck around with galleries or wait to read current critical dribble in a print art magazine. That's the leapfrogging I mentioned before, about the public finding art on their own terms and skipping the art world's lack of respect and inefficient methodologies.

 

Sherwin: So how does this direction benefit artists?

 

Born: Today so many people make art, more than all the artists in the past combined, and there's the fast-developing demand for local, original work. So I'm interested in the idea of algorithms to narrow it down to help people get to the art they want in their lives more efficiently. It ultimately lets the audience find their voice and taste, and delve deep into the pool of contemporary art - and not just the art pushed upon them by artists who know how to aggressively market their work, (or worse, purchased work as a way to prove you "get it" even though you hate it.).

 

Sherwin: So the role of art writers, in general, is changing?

 

Born: I'll answer your question with a question. Once people start finding, buying and falling in love with art, without experts, critics and tastemakers, will we need art writing at all? Probably not. Art is thriving everywhere, but the system is slowly closing out critics and elite gallerists.

 

Sherwin: In closing, would you like to add a final thought?

 

Born: A new, healthy art + public populist model will continue to emerge, but it simply won't include art critics, assuming they keep using ridiculous language and the writing stays dry as a bone. So whenever a critic gives an apocalyptic view of artwork, I always consider that they're probably in a panic about their rent. Make no mistake -- the "art dying" rants often come from a speaker who is actually the one at death's door.

 

Take care, Stay true

 

Brian Sherwin



[Services:
FASO: Want Your Art Career to Grow?  Set up an Artist Website with FASO.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $12,500 in awards. 

Daily Art Show: Daily Show of Art that reaches thousands of potential collectors.

Backstory: About Clint. Email EditorTwitter. Republish. ]


Related Posts:

FineArtViews Interview: Sarah Eilefson -- Grants and Communications Coordinator for the National Veterans Art Museum

Artist Interviews: Thinking back on James Rosenquist and Vito Acconci concerning how artists are labeled by art critics

FineArtViews Interview: Blek le Rat (Xavier Prou) -- Originator of Stencil Graffiti Art, Living Legend of the Street Art / Graffiti Art Scene

FineArtViews Interview: Jimmy Wales, Jay Walsh, and Liam Wyatt -- of the Wikimedia Foundation concerning Visual Art articles on Wikipedia

FineArtViews Interview: Ben Luke -- contemporary art critic for the London Evening Standard

FineArtViews Interview: Mat Gleason -- Art Critic and Founder of Coagula Art Journal

FineArtViews Interview: Saul Ostrow -- Art Critic and Art Editor for BOMB Magazine


Topics: art appreciation | art criticism | art websites | Art World | Brian Sherwin | FineArtViews | FineArtViews Interview Series | support local art 

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 5 Comments

Clint Watson
via faso.com
"Once people start finding, buying and falling in love with art, without experts, critics and tastemakers, will we need art writing at all? Probably not. Art is thriving everywhere, but the system is slowly closing out critics and elite gallerists."

That's a great quote. I think the future is bright for those who adapt, "non-elite" gallerists, one might say. Also, art is thriving, however the amount of choice is now overwhelming - I think critics and writers can find a place in helping people to find great artists - there's always going to be room for people who help to curate - those people help increase the signal and decrease the noise.

Joyce Dade
via faso.com
I loved reading this interview and the comments made about art critics and new and authentic trends as they continue to emerge and "planks leaning against a wall..." Thank you for this one, Brian and thank you for your candor and intelligent, your apparent chutzpah and maverick commentary, K. Born. The "closing out of elite gallerists," sounds like an old schoolers nightmare but, a point very well made and taken to be sure. Thank you for the informed QandA! Others may be timid in making these kind of statements, I'm so glad someone has the courage of conviction, experience and audacity to make it so clear to us all.

Donald Fox
via faso.com
Criticism isn't only for the purpose of reviewing a show or attempting to promote a particular artist or agenda. Critics sometimes express appreciation for an artist's work by placing it within the larger context of a particular time, an entire career, or an even larger historical trend. Some of these pieces don't show up in the regular art press but in other publications like the New York Review of Books, Harper's Magazine, or collected essays. Few art critics could match the art writing of the late John Updike, for example. Criticism can also illuminate the art of a particular historical period by examining the relationships between artists, their concerns, their societies, and their influence on others.

Personally, I think people who appreciate art will continue to write about art. Whether these people will be called art critics, I can't say. My main concern is with the quality of writing. Already there has been a significant decline in literate writing, perhaps partly due to the increase in self-publication via the internet. The rush to publish does none of us any favors. I'm hoping for a pendulum swing away from quantity towards reason, literacy, and quality.

Casey Craig
via faso.com
"The public will want to make their own decisions and be drawn to artwork that has meaning in the work itself, and not the essay behind the desk." ~ Refreshing!!! Thanks, Brian and Kathryn.

Jo Allebach
via faso.com
This was a great interview. What a concept -


"they're leapfrogging high art, and going right to the stuff they intuitively like."












 

FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database

 

FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved