Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life


« Artist Interviews: Thinking back on James Rosenquist and Vito Acconci concerning how artists are labeled by art critics | Main | FineArtViews Interview: Jimmy Wales, Jay Walsh, and Liam Wyatt -- of the Wikimedia Foundation concerning Visual Art articles on Wikipedia »

Follow this Blog

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip


Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

About the Artist
acrylic painting
advice for artists
art and culture
art and psychology
art and society
art appreciation
art blogging advice
Art Business
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art fairs
art festivals
art forum
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art reception
art show
art studio
art supplies
art websites
artist resume advice
artist statement
Artwork videos
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
Carolyn Edlund
Carolyn Henderson
Carrie Turner
Clint Watson
commissioned art
Cory Huff
Curator's Pick
Daily Art Show
Dave Geada
Dave Nevue
email newsletters
Eric Rhoads
exposure tips
FASO Featured Artists
Fine Art Shows
framing art
Gayle Faucette Wisbon
giclee prints
Guest Posts
Internet Scams
Jack White
Jane Hunt
Jason Horejs
Jen Piche
John Weiss
Juried Shows
Kathleen Dunphy
Keith Bond
Kelley Sanford
Kim VanDerHoek
landscape painting
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Mark Edward Adams
mixed media
Moshe Mikanovsky
New FASO Artist Members
Noteworthy Artist
oil painting
online art competitions
online art groups
open studio
plein air painting
press releases
pricing artwork
S.C. Mummert
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
shipping artwork
social media
social networking
solo show
Steve Atkinson
still life art
support local art
Think Tank
websites for artists
Zac Elletson

 Apr 2018
Mar 2018
Feb 2018
Jan 2018
Dec 2017
Nov 2017
Oct 2017
Sep 2017
Aug 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
Apr 2017
Mar 2017
Feb 2017
Jan 2017
Dec 2016
Nov 2016
Oct 2016
Sep 2016
Aug 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
Apr 2016
Mar 2016
Feb 2016
Jan 2016
Dec 2015
Nov 2015
Oct 2015
Sep 2015
Aug 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
Apr 2015
Mar 2015
Feb 2015
Jan 2015
Dec 2014
Nov 2014
Oct 2014
Sep 2014
Aug 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
Apr 2014
Mar 2014
Feb 2014
Jan 2014
Dec 2013
Nov 2013
Oct 2013
Sep 2013
Aug 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sep 2012
Aug 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Apr 2012
Mar 2012
Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005


Artists Rights Online: Should Artists be Wary of a Social Networking Websites Terms of Service (TOS) Agreement? Part 1

by Brian Sherwin on 7/9/2011 7:07:52 PM

This article is by Brian Sherwin, regular contributing writer for FineArtViews. Brian Sherwin is an art critic, blogger, curator, artist and writer based near Chicago, Illinois. He has been published in Hi Fructose Magazine, Illinois Times, and other publications, and linked to by publications such as The Huffington Post, The Boston Globe, Juxtapoz Magazine, Deutsche Bank ArtMag, ARTLURKER, Myartspace, Blabbermouth, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Modern Art Obsession, Citizen LA, Shark Forum, Two Coats of Paint and Art Fag City. You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.

In recent years there has been a lot of debate among visual artists concerning terms of service (TOS) on various popular websites -- and the rights of artists online due to the rise of online social networking. The main focus of concern involves social networking sites and user ownership-- and what happens to ownership when an image is uploaded. Myspace and Facebook have both received criticism from artists for not stating that users retain ownership of the content they upload. The issue has been raised again with Google's trial release of Google+. Needless to say, many artists are concerned that ownership of their images will be lost if they upload images to social networking websites in general.


The concern that artists have for terms of service does not stop with Myspace, Facebook, and Google+. Art focused social networking sites-- such as Myartspace and DeviantART -- have received criticism in the past until terms were rewritten to accommodate wary artists. Even after TOS changes that clearly state that users retain ownership of their content it is common for criticism of terms to continue. It begs the question: Should artists be wary of a websites terms of service? In my opinion, it depends on how you approach the issue. Many artist forget that TOS exist in order to protect a website from unnecessary lawsuits filed by website users.


There are several reasons why websites protect themselves with the common legal jargon found in a TOS section. For example, the content you upload to the website may end up residing on servers that are outside of the companies control. Without specific terms you could technically file a lawsuit against the website if that occurs. Obviously the owner of a website is not going to risk being sued for something that is bound to happen at one point or the other.


Search engines-- such as Yahoo and Google protect themselves in the same manner. In fact, if you are reading this I can promise you that you are 'accepting' the terms of whatever search engine you used to find this article. No matter what you do online you are under some form of TOS agreement whether you are aware of it or not. One could suggest that the Internet as we know it would be unable to function without TOS agreements.


In addition to the above a TOS agreement also protects the company from legal trouble if your content is shared on the website itself by other users. This is accomplished by making it clear that the user is responsible for the content that is uploaded. Without that wording a social networking website like Facebook would be leaving itself open to be sued by individuals as well as corporate entities that own copyright every time a site user uploads images, videos, and other forms of content without express consent from the copyright owner.


Point blank -- without the protection of specific terms a website, such as Facebook or DeviantART, would not be able to realistically function. The Internet itself would be a useless void lacking information -- very few individuals and companies would want to risk being sued by providing services that allow content to be spread virally online. That is something to think about when criticizing TOS agreements in general. Do you want the Internet or not? It is your choice.


In closing Part 1 of this series I think it is important for artists to grasp that social networking sites -- as well as other types of websites, and search engines for that matter -- are generally protecting themselves with the terms of service they adhere to. There is nothing wrong with being concerned about specific terms of service agreements -- but artists must realize that without TOS agreements in general the Internet as we know it would not exist. Public interest in art-- which has grown steadily due to the Internet-- would cease to increase as it has over the years.


And now for Part 2...


Take care, Stay true,


Brian Sherwin


FASO: The Leading Provider of Professional Artist Websites.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $25,000 in awards. 

Daily Art Show: Daily Show of Art that reaches thousands of potential collectors.


Related Posts:

Selling Fine Art Online: Actual Art Website Reviews & Traffic Data? Really? Maybe not.

Selling Fine Art Online: FASO Mobile-friendly Artist Websites - the Future of Online Art Marketing is Now

Success (dot) com

The Right Way to Publish Your Blog to Facebook

Social Media versus SEO - Which is the Better Investment?

Topics: Brian Sherwin | Facebook | FineArtViews | websites for artists | social networking 

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 1 Comment

Loading comments...

All good points. If Facebook did that I'd bet money that a class action lawsuit would be in Mr. Z's future. LOL

Image quality on uploads are not good enough to use for prints unless the person is uploading huge files. Art people need to be smart about uploading.


FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database


FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved