Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life


« Facebook Like Button Count Inaccuracies | Main | Charles Cox ~ Old World charm and grace, along with his masterful brushwork, contribute to the enchanting effect of these works. »


Follow this Blog



Subscribe to our Newsletter



Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip

 

Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

















Topical Index

Current
advice for artists
art appreciation
Art Business
art challenge
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art website design
art websites
Art World
artist tribute
artist website tips
artist websites
BoldBrush Interview
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
BrushBuzz
Canvoo
Carolyn Henderson
Clint Watson
Connie Tom
copyright
creativity
Daniel Keys
Deber Klein
email newsletters
exposure tips
Facebook
FASO
FASO Art News
FineArtViews
FineArtViews Interview Series
Google
Guest Posts
InformedCollector
inspiration
Instruction
Jack White
Keith Bond
Linda Mikulich
Lisa Call
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Matthew Mahler
Moshe Mikanovsky
online art groups
originality
painting
politics
pricing artwork
religion
Robert Genn
Sarah Maple
sculpting
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
social networking
street art
support local art
Think Tank
Twitter
websites for artists




 Archives:Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005

 

How Art Exhibition Jurors Make Decisions

by M. Stephen Doherty on 7/7/2010 9:07:20 AM

This post is by guest author, M. Stephen Doherty. This article has been edited and published with the author's permission. You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.


About the Author: M. Stephen Doherty earned a Master of Fine Arts degree from Cornell University and served as editor-in-chief of American Artist magazine for 31 years. He has written a dozen books, hundreds of magazine articles, and he has judged art competitions for the National Watercolor Society, the Winter Park Art Festival, The National Oil & Acrylic Painters Society, the International Association of Pastel Societies, the Salmagundi Club, Arts for the Parks, and Plein Air Easton. He is now a consulting executive editor, a painter, and workshop teacher.

During more than 30 years of judging national, regional, and local art contests, I learned that the results often depend on completely arbitrary circumstances. What that means to you is that the artistic merit of your painting is only one of the factors influencing whether it is rejected from the exhibition or wins the top award. The more you understand these circumstances, the more likely it will be that you can achieve your goals.

The results of an art contest depend on the number of judges, the experience those individuals bring to the process, the categories of awards, the way entries are presented, the quality of your photography, the information provided to judges, and the time allocated for the review process.

For example, last year I judged a show in which many of the artists didn’t format their digital photographs so they could be viewed on the judging website and I wasn’t able to consider their artwork. And I was once given a notebook defining what work could be considered for each of the prizes and my choices had to take into account all those definitions. In both cases, a significant number of artists didn’t have a chance at winning prizes because they didn’t pay enough attention to entry procedures and prize categories outlined in the prospectus.

So what can you do to increase your chances of getting into a juried show and winning an award? Here are some suggestions I can offer based on my experience:

Enter Your Best Work
Judges will reject all three entries by an artist if one of the pieces is not as strong as the other two. If you only have two great paintings available to submit to a contest, then only enter those pieces.

Enter the Maximum Number
If you have several outstanding pieces to submit, it’s always better to show judges that your talent is solid and consistent by allowing them to review three great paintings instead of just one.

Enter Pieces that are Unusual, Not Safe
Collectors may buy artwork that is safe and typical, but judges prefer works that are exceptional. When you are trying to decide which pieces to enter, ask for advice from an experienced artist or teacher, not your mother.

Don’t Assume Judges Will Like Artwork That is Similar to Their Own
Judges are often more critical of artwork that is similar to their own. The standards they apply to their own work are much higher than those they use for judging other subjects or styles.

Enter Work That Can Be Quickly Understood
Judges only look at digital photographs or slide entries for a few seconds, and they are more apt to respond positively to images that are immediately understood rather than those that are so subtle and require careful study. Make sure the artwork you enter is well defined and that the contrast between the values is distinct.

Don’t Enter Pieces That Push the Limits of Good Taste, Humor, Scale, or Presentation
Very few judges want to offend exhibition organizers or the viewing public by selecting work those people might consider offensive, too big, poorly framed, or politically incorrect. If you want to challenge the norms, make sure the organization, venue, and judges will welcome those challenges.

Consider Entering Work that Fits Into Less Competitive Categories
You are more likely to receive recognition for your drawings, sculptures, or acrylic paintings than for your oils in competitions in which most of the entries are oil paintings.

Don’t Take Contest Results Too Seriously

A friend of mine keeps paintings on the fireplace mantel in his studio that he has entered in several contests. On the backs side of the frames, he records the results from each submission. One painting was rejected from three competitions and won prizes in four others (including “Best of Show”), and the other paintings have similar track records. “I keep the paintings on display so I remind myself that art contests are based on completely subjective reviews,” he explains. That story is worth keeping in mind the next time your work is rejected from an art contest of it wins the Best of Show award.



[Services:
FASO: Want Your Art Career to Grow?  Set up an Artist Website with FASO.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $6,000 in awards. 

Backstory: About Clint. Email Editor.  Submit a guest post.  Twitter. Republish. ]


Related Posts:

It's What You Know, Not Whom

Building Art Career Credentials

Developing Your Individual Style

Handling Rejection

How to Survive an Art Critique


Topics: inspiration

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 77 Comments

Marilyn Gilis
via fineartviews.com
Good article. Thanks for the information. A good example of how not t take rejection personally.
Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Hi Stephen,

Thanks for an interesting article. Collector's tastes are arbitrary so why shouldn't we believe that jurors tastes are any different?

I especially appreciate the advice of not trying to submit something that mimics the juror's work. It seems entirely reasonable that something like that might get much more critical scrutiny than something entirely different. Something that might interest them because of the difference.

Thanks again,

Michael

Kelly Medford
via fineartviews.com
Wow, this is really useful information, thank you! Of course we "know" not to take rejections personally, but this gives real insight into what judges are looking for. I especially like the comment about asking other artists what to submit and not our mothers, ha! Thanks for the insight.
Marsha Hamby Savage
via fineartviews.com
This is a very valuable article for artists submitting to competition. Thank you Stephen for your insight from the judge's viewpoint. As you know, we have a hard time separating the art for sale to the public and the art that might be more appropriate for judging in competition. Your remarks are perfect about trying for something a little less "safe". Good info all around!
Jill Banks
via fineartviews.com
Thanks Stephen for writing this article. All great points. I particular appreciate knowing that judges will reject all three if one is not "up to the standard" of others. A question -- is there ever difficulty being chosen if the pieces submitted are "too" equal? Do judges doubt themselves when they can't decide which is better?

Jill Banks
via fineartviews.com
I know a lot of artists who try to size up the judge and put in artwork that fits the juror's style. I think that's really a mistake ... as is trying to overthink. Putting in pieces you're personally proud of, that represent your strongest work is the way to go.

Carol Schmauder
via fineartviews.com
Thank you for your insights into judges criteria. It is nice to know what is considered when you enter art work into competitions.

Monte Wilson
via fineartviews.com
Thanks Stephen for the wonderful article! You provide great insight and knowledge into the process. And your friend who keeps paintings on the mantel to keep track of what's happened with each is an encouraging point.

Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Stephen,

One other point. Your comment about not submitting anything but your best because the one bad painting (I'm paraphrasing here) might bring down your whole group also hits home. I'm presently going through my website to do the same thing.

Of course I hope I have a website when I'm done pulling down the clunkers...

Michael


Marsha Hamby Savage
via fineartviews.com
Michael, thanks for that comment about going through our own website to do the same thing about sub-standard work bringing the others down. And, I had not really used the same logic when it pertains to the submissions -- even though I always try to submit my best work. But, the thought that even the slightest degree of lesser quality might be grounds to keep from submitting one.

I recently did the same thing with my web site on the advice of a wonderful nationally known artist that is a good friend. He was so right. I still think I need to take another look. We are so emotionally involved in each of our works that sometimes it is almost impossible to be impartial and make those decisions.
Elizabeth Stone
via fineartviews.com
Stephen Doherty's article is more important for my art career stage than any I've read so far. Juried art competitions are so mysterious and the results so hit or miss. I assume they are important in building a resume and getting my work seen and not just fundraisers for the art organization. Am I correct?

My suggestion for seeing the inner workings of juried art shows is to volunteer for one. And my suggestion for organizations that put on juried shows is to use blind jurying as much as possible and to find a way to standardize the digital requirements we artists have to follow.

Thanks for your great hints.



Marian Fortunati
via fineartviews.com
Terrific article... clear and really a good reminder about what most of us know.
Early on as I began trying to enter shows I had the opportunity to sit in on a jurying process. It was fascinating ... and of course, just as you have described.
Here is the blog... one of my first thanks to Clint's encouragement after signing up with FASO...
http://marianfortunati.com/blog/974/being-a-fly-on-the-wall-during-the-jurying-process-for-an-art-show




K. Henderson
via fineartviews.com
Thanks! I've been asked to talk about this subject at a local art organization. You've summed it up nicely
Barb
via fineartviews.com
I have often thought of entering into contest, but thought I'd not be good enough, maybe I'll give it a try, thanks for a great article.
Carol McIntyre
via fineartviews.com
Marvelous summation! Thank you Stephen.

I like the advice mentioned above, and will go and "judge" my websites. Maybe I could get a few fellow artists to be on a Judge Panel and go through my work?

When I have judged a few shows, I found myself much more interested in the work that was NOT like mine, so I reinforce Stephen's comment above.

One area Stephen did not mention, is that we never know what the entire body of submissions looked like. In one show I judged, I remember being disappointed by the lack of abstract, experimental, unsafe work, etc. that was submitted; the exhibition leaned in that direction.


Donna Robillard
via fineartviews.com
I really enjoyed reading all the suggestions for submissions. There are a couple of them I need to work on. For my last competition I entered I had two of my three submissions accepted, and I am currently waiting the results of another. For this last one I've entered submissions two or three different years and have not been accepted yet; but I will keep trying until I get one accepted! It's a goal and challenge of mine.

Kim
via fineartviews.com
I'm having great success with juried exhibitions and competitions when the jurying is done from the real artwork, as opposed to jurying done from my digital images, so I'm wondering if the quality of one's digital images is a far greater factor than we may assume.
Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Stephan, your thoughts and experience as an art juror, writer, artist,editor(all awesome acheivements)serve you well to have knowledge we all seek when entering competitions and self critique of our work. This news letter is a high point for all of us at FASO. Thank you for sharing with us so intimately your advice about this important part of growth as an artist. We would love hearing more from you

George De Chiara
via fineartviews.com
Great article. I hadn't thought about all of my work being rejected if one of the entries wasn't as good as the others. Very interesting point. I've noticed a few slide parties that I've gone to that some artist enter work in many different styles and wondered if that could have the same effect.
Kim
via fineartviews.com
I agree that there are some points to consider here that I was unaware of. What's tricky is deciding what constitutes 'unusual' versus 'safe,' as much of what I see winning representational awards hasn't struck me as particularly unusual. Lovely and well executed in many respects, but not exactly what I'd describe as unusual in subject matter or style.
Sandy Askey-Adams
via fineartviews.com
Stephen...
Thank you, thank you for sharing your expericne and for this well-written, informative and educational article that most every artist needs to learn from and use. I know I cetainly needed to read this. I have juried a couple of art shows myself, but I still find it hard to figure out my own best work. Like a "Duh" for me. I can feel so stupid.
What you shared is an article that I need to have a copy of for my files to read and refer to often...or at least each time I am condsidering entering a competition or not... which scares me anyway.
I also like the idea that Michael stated about treating our web sites in the same way...post only our best which I would think most of us try to do, but we get to hung up on some of the paintings and end up not always doing that. AND, I think what Marsha said about getting the advice of another artist in selecting our better work for on our web sites is a great idea too. I have a hard time because it can get so personal. As a matter fact which reminds me and while I am thinking of it.....Marsha, when you were here for a visit, one of the paintings that I had already framed here that we discussed what could be better about the painting, I have already taken it out of its frame this morning with the intent of taking out what needs to be removed from the painting and fixing up some of what you had suggested...Thank you again. It will definite be an improvement on the overall composition!! I Will be taking it to the Wickford Arts Festival with me this coming weekend.
BUT, again Stephan, thank you again. A few weeks ago on my facebook wall page, this very subject was discussed about juried art shows and what to do, etc....so this article you wrote is right in time. I hope all the artists who made comments on that wall page post, will now see and read your article. It will help all of us!!


Misty Beauchamp
via fineartviews.com
This is a very good article that does not spend all its time on the same trite "make sure you read the prospectus and don't send an abstract to a realism competition, and make sure your slides are in focus" drivel that we all know or should know anyway.

I was privileged and humbled to sit in on a slide jurying presentation for our local art association's national show where the jurying process was unveiled to me. It was very eye- opening.

In the course of the evening, we "jurors" reviewed hundreds of slides in groups of three, and scored the entrants numerically in categories such as composition, overall appeal, style, etc.
By the time it was over with, I had a new and profound respect for the jurying process and especially for the person or people who ultimately judges the accepted works for awards. I learned several things:

1. The person who gives out the awards, especially in a national competition, is not likely to be the same person or people who select the pieces that are accepted to the show.

2. If I EVER see another piece of fruit in a typical still life arrangement, I think I will throw up- just kidding! Seriously though, there were so many still lifes with fruit done the same old tired ways that when one artist's entries presented a fresh take on fruit, she made the cut in my book, and everyone else concurred.

3. There is only about 5-8 seconds to view all three entries so they need to first of all be contrasty- in other words, the value drama needs to immediately grab the attention of the judges. Soft pastels and pieces that had little value change were not interesting enough to bear a second look.

4. Especially for a festival display,the three works submitted need to present a cohesive feeling- think of showing the judges three works that best embody your current oeuvre. A no-no is three works that look like they might have been painted by three different artists. Even though they might all be excellent stand-alone works, the disparity between them suggests that the artist has not found his technique or "style" yet, and has not matured fully. (I work in a lot of different media, so I learned to submit works to a show that are the same medium and of similar size and subject, so my work looks like it belongs together and I appear to be more focused as an artist, rather than like a jack of all trades and master of none.)

5. After looking at a couple hundred slides, which by the way were nearly all technically proficient works by obviously talented artists who took their craft very seriously, I began to think "show me something different, interesting, or amazing, not just technically correct". From that, I inferred that sometimes the jurors might be bored to tears looking at uniformly good, and even excellent work that does not stand out from the crowd, and so they long to see something with that extra pop, that je ne sais quoi that makes it stand out. The lesson I learned- even though it is good art does not automatically make it accepted art.

Never get down in the dumps over a rejection. Think about it- out of say a thousand entries, there is only space for maybe a hundred or so works. That already makes it only a 10 percent chance at acceptance. Then there are only a handful of awards to be presented, and finally it comes down to personal taste of the awards juror(s) rather than technical merit. For example, I had a piece some years ago accepted to an international art show that was systematically rejected by every local show thereafter. Go figure. The best thing to do is submit, submit, submit. Keep plugging away and the elusive prize will eventually come, I think.


Sharon Weaver
via fineartviews.com
Everything you say rings true but it still stings when a work is rejected. On the other hand, I can't help but feel joy when a piece is included in a show or wins a prize. Getting recognition, even if it is subjective, just feels good.

Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Stephen, so this is the recipe that I have been looking for when it comes to understanding what goes on in the juried art process. I am grateful that you gave this mysterious process a lot of transparency for us. I have felt like a lemming running along with all the other blind lemmings going off the cliff for years. The closed curtain seems to have opened up a bit so I can see now how the jury staging process is built.
Actually I do realize that quality photographic images are important, sending in your best work and the maximum number of images accepted. For the other pointers, I am going to print this article out and keep it as a reminder. I'm tired of getting rejected from regional shows. The competition is tough and if I know what the judges are looking for, I can be better equipped to be in the final running, not going off the cliff to my suicide.
By the way, Cornell is one of the best ivy league colleges out there, I was almost accepted into their architectural program almost 30 years ago in 1982. Missed it by one tenth of a grade average. I'm glad I did, I love fine art more.

Kim
via fineartviews.com
Very interesting additional comments and peeks into the process! I was a bit troubled by this issue, however:

"3. There is only about 5-8 seconds to view all three entries so they need to first of all be contrasty- in other words, the value drama needs to immediately grab the attention of the judges. Soft pastels and pieces that had little value change were not interesting enough to bear a second look."

Five to eight seconds to view artwork seems to me to be woefully inadequate, and I have to wonder if that indicates a problem in the concept of the juried exhibition in question. Perhaps there needs to be a limit to the number of entries artists can submit, a shorter deadline time to limit entries, or more time needs to be scheduled to do the actual jurying of the work. I just don't think a process with a built in selection bias toward the most grabby, high contrasty, or flamboyant pieces is really a desirable direction for juried exhibitions to be heading. These characteristics do not necessarily equate with high quality.
Carol McIntyre
via fineartviews.com
I remember one well known artist suggesting "Paint it RED and paint it BIG!" Has this worked for anyone?
PHIL LACHAPELLE
via fineartviews.com
I respect Stephen Doherty's art experience, comments and knowledge.
I have found that juror's decisions are unpredictable and at times make no sense.
Stephen Doherty's suggestion of submitting your best work is followed by most artists. What an artist thinks is his best work is overlooked many times. Sometimes we artists have submitted what we consider our "second tier" work to test the judging and find that one of these works is accepted and also leads to a ribbon.
The last paragraph of his article puts the reality into the art judgment arena. An artist submits "his best" and it is entered in a crap shoot. Most of us are not detained by that and we keep trying. That's the reality.

Kim
via fineartviews.com
Carol, I don't know about red, but I do think size is definitely a factor. I have noticed in the juried exhibitions I've entered lately where I have been able to view all the (accepted) entries in person, the biggest pieces typically get the top awards!
Carol McIntyre
via fineartviews.com
What a shame, because there are so many marvelous small gems. Sounds like the judges have fallen into the old human weakness of "following the path of least resistance.....or that it easiest."
Sandy Askey-Adams
via fineartviews.com
Kim!!!
You have very good valid point...and that would need to be further explained to me by those who feel that one needs only 5 to 8 seconds although the 8 seconds does not sound so bad if you sit back and pretend this screen is a painting and seeing how long 5 to 8 seconds passes by. It can make sense. When I juried an art show, the seconds really did not seem as short...however, it was more than 5 seconds!!!
AND, Carol, I too have heard the expression "paint it red and paint it big"! Apparently that has worked quite often for artists. Have seen it happen many times.
:)Sandy
Sandy Askey-Adams
via fineartviews.com
Question....Do you think jurors/judges can be bias in selecting the work for a juried art show and the awards?
When I had posted this same topic on my facebook wall, there were many, many comments. Quite a few spoke of the bias that some judges have toward art work and artists...and remember too if a judge knows of a well known artists work, they also KNOW their style even if the name does not show. It can be obvious as to whose work it is. Some who have juried work said they are more harsh toward that artist (that is also a bias)..and others said they have seen artists win because of who they were and not just based solely upon their work. Even a well known exceptional artist who does high quality, excellent work as a rule can have some that are not up to par, but may still win an award or get into that juried show because of who they are.
I think we have all seen that happen.
Sorry to bring that up, but that was also part of what was discussed with this topic. It can happen.
:)Sandy
Kim
via fineartviews.com
Sandy, thanks for elaborating! Jurors and judges are human beings, and they bring all sorts of things to the selection process, both deliberately and subconsciously, so I don't see how it can ever be an entirely objective process. I'm sure there's a bit of cronyism occurring as well within certain art communities, from local on up to the regional and national levels.
Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Sandy, a show that I am presently in was judged by an artist who the director imported all the way across the nation just to make sure there was not any bias. The judge did not have any familiarity with the artists and did not paint in this plein air style herself. I will be looking forward to seeing the whole juried show. I saw some of the images that were accepted and I beg to differ with some of them. In my mind, I thought, What???? So much for flying a judge 3,0000 miles to to toss the salad.
Never mind the bias, a judge can have a preliminary expectation of the cohesiveness that he/she wants the public to view in his/her exhibit. If it is a certain style, like plein air impressionism, then the artist's works who form that vision of the judge will be picked. That will reject any artist who bucks or deviates from the style even if their art is of excellent quality. It will also pick pretty much the same group of artists that paint like each other.
I do believe that it is a future duty of each show director to lay out in the prospectus, the criteria in the choosing of the art based upon what principles, what look they are seeking, etc... to make this process more transparent to us applying artists.
Or the judge themselves should provide a statement of intent, then it won`t be such a blind process and a roll of the dice or a lottery ticket.
I have seen some shows do this and I know, we don't read the whole thing, but I will!


Kathy Chin
via fineartviews.com
Stephen,

Thanks very much for sharing your "judge's perspective" obviously we've all learned from it. I've heard horror stories from County Fair Art judges who've had to reject beautiful work simply because the artists (for whatever reasons) did not follow directions. Have never heard that judges often judge on your whole body of work, not just individual images, so that is very helpful to know. Entering less "full" categories is also interesting, although I know of many artists who prefer to enter those categories with the "best of the best" artists so they can compare themselves to them.
Bottom line, if we keep telling ourselves that judging is subjective (and often includes bias) the better off we'll be.
Kathleen McElwaine
via fineartviews.com
This article was one of the best I have read in putting the process in perspective. Each of the recommendations is exactly right on. I don't enter many competitions but I am on my communities "Percent for the Arts Commitee" and I am the only visual artist - Some art needs the correct venue - Thanks for the great information that is shared through Fine Art Views. Kathleen McElwaine, Leander Texas
Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Hi Steven,
Thanks for a most helpful post! Many excellent points were made by both you and the participating artists! I have read many of your articles in various art publications and appreciate your sharing some "insider" information with us. I have always felt that judging was a very subjective process and still do. I'm always hopeful that I will be on the "favored" side of the judging although I haven't really entered many competitions. With so much wonderful work out there, I think judging an art competition has to be extremely difficult. I will add this post to my keepers pile and refer to it for the next competition that I dare to enter!
Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Thanks for the great overview Stephen. This is great feedback and in line with my experiences as a juror as well. Also - thanks for taking the time to write a post for FineArtViews!

Kim
via fineartviews.com
Esther: "...I do believe that it is a future duty of each show director to lay out in the prospectus, the criteria in the choosing of the art based upon what principles, what look they are seeking, etc... to make this process more transparent to us applying artists..."

Yep, but moreover, adhere to those criteria. It is quite confusing to submit one's work to a competition with the criteria in mind only to find that some work was chosen and awarded that met few if any of them.
Carol McIntyre
via fineartviews.com
Kim it is not only confusing, as you may imagine, but aggravating. A couple of years ago when I entered a supposedly good show (good reputation), they changed the rules after submissions! They decided they preferred smaller paintings in the show. Needless to say, I dropped my membership.
Phyllis OShields Fine Art
via fineartviews.com
Thank you for the excellent understandable presentation of material. Really good points to remember some of which I was not aware. Mahalo... Phyllis OShields
Misty Beauchamp
via fineartviews.com
When I mentioned the 5-8 second viewing, perhaps I should have elaborated more.

We were members of a class and we were viewing submissions as though we were the actual jury panel who selected the works that would be included for future consideration- however we were not the actual jurors. It was explained to us that the artists' slide submissions who did not follow directions, the blurry or otherwise deficient slides, and the mis- or unlabeled slides were already eliminated. We were told that typically, fifteen seconds or so was allowed for the viewing and scoring- so I figured 5-8 seconds for the actual viewing and 5-12 seconds to write down the numbers in the categories. Of course, any juror was free to ask that a slide or series of slides be shown again, and they could also ask that a slide be shown longer if they needed. Surprisingly, very little of that happened. Once we got into the groove of viewing and scoring, it all happened pretty fast, and we could separate the awesome from the merely good.

It is very easy to say that such a short time is not long enough to really see the art, and that is understandable until you actually sit through the process. However,if one does the rough math, one can potentially review somewhere around four pictures per minute, or 240 per hour. That is the work of just 80 artists who each submit three pictures for the festival show. Thus it would take ten hours to review 800 artists' submissions for the show at the 15 second rate. If a full minute was spent on 800 artist's works, at three works per artist, we would be talking about a 40 hour work week to determine which slides make the initial cut! Thus, it is in the preliminary jurors' best interest to quickly eliminate blah, boring art or works with any kind of perspective or composition flaw immediately, along with works that are just not up to par with the quality of the general body of work for the show. This is not the only review of the works. Once the work makes the initial cut, this means it is worthy of a second and maybe even a third look for actual jurying into or out of the show, based on the available spaces, the size of the artists' displays, and other factors. It may not be the best way, but it is what is available to jurors right now, I guess. It is probably a lot different for shows that are judged onsite, rather than by slide, but I only know what I saw that day.
Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Kim, confusing is the status quo when it comes to submitting to almost any juried show. I just want to have a chance to have the knowledge of what artistic direction the juror is seeking and if the director also have a request or specifics they relay to the juror. That's all, it is not hard to write it up in the prospectus. Do they want totally unique modern art or do they want representational, traditional works. Do they want traditional works of art with a movement towards abstract, more colorful works? It does not have to be a secret society where only the inside members get the info. One of my art associations is doing just that, spelling it out in the prospectus somewhat but still not thoroughly. I think some of these art shows are organized so quickly sometimes, they do not take the time to inform the artist. They just want to hang a show to make more dollars. Sorry, but I really feel that way sometimes. I just pulled back from entering certain shows finally.

One more point, this is just a simple exercise for anyone who wants to spend an hour (or two) going through images as if they are a judge in an art contest. I have done this several times and it gets very old streaming through images to find the entries that stand out above the rest. 5-8 seconds seems like hours when you want the screen to get to the next image. I can sum it up in 2 seconds. Go to the FineArtViews Art Competition page. Click on the month of June and then click see all, start at the first image and then start the process of clicking to the next image and so on until it ends. If you are a seasoned artist, you will soon wish the computer had a lighting fast processor with warp speed. When a great piece of art appears, then you want to stay a few seconds. Unfortunately they are not all great. There are hundreds of images in the FineArtView contests, so it will drive one mad in a short time. One of the benefits this can give is that this process of forcing your eyes to evaluate images one after another, give you a new outlook on just what is great art and what does not measure up to quality standards. Also it gives eye strain and maybe a migraine!


Kim
via fineartviews.com
Misty, thanks for the additional explanation. I can see that a first culling might require less time. I should have asked if that was for the initial evaluation and screening or for the awards, as more time would (hopefully) be expended on the latter.
Esther, I entered and was accepted into a juried show that had a size limit and I submitted entries that were within the limit. A disgruntled artist friend pointed out at the opening reception, however, that one of the winning entries was clearly well over the size limit, and this friend had wanted to enter a painting but ultimately didn't because his own painting exceeded the size limit! Either the sizes of the entries were ignored during the jurying, or the jurist knew and blatantly decided to accept and then award the piece anyway, regardless of the criteria!
Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Kim, that kind of thing does go on unfortunately. If people complain about it, the jury process will change the next year. This business is not regulated by any overseeing agency and people will get away with what they can until they are caught. Why not be fair and just in the first place?

Judy Mudd
via fineartviews.com
Thank you for such an informative post. At our national watercolor show here in Kentucky, a couple of years ago I was involved in the judge's selection and was with the judge when he chose the winners. I could NOT figure out his system of selection and finally asked him what he saw in the paintings--he couldn't really tell me. One was too "stiff" the other too "loose", he got down on his knees, took his glasses off and was inches from the painting trying to see technique or if white paint was used in a painting. He completely dismissed an outstanding painting that subsequently received high awards in other competitions (he didn't even place it 15th in our show). I'm just getting started in entering competitions, so sharing your wisdom as a judge is very welcomed.
Kim
via fineartviews.com
I was told about a judging process for a competition in which I won an award last year that sounded very fair: each piece was placed on an easel and spot lit in a room that had lowered lighting. Each of the judges (3?), sitting at about the same distance from the easel, scored the piece and that was how the awards were determined. There was some discussion between judges over various issues in order to arrive at consensus.
Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Kim, that is how my San Clemente Art Association judges the juried art shows. They have 3 jurors who use a scoring pad with 5 categories like composition, color, values, presentation etc.. All the work is judged in person at the gallery. I receive more awards there than any other show. The signatures are covered to prevent bias. Even with that many jurors, the scores can be skewed if one judge is too lenient and the next is too critical and the third is somewhere in between. We just have to take it with a grain of salt anymore.


Monte Wilson
via fineartviews.com
Y'all have great points and interesting experiences. For me personally, awards don't even enter my mind. You can't win an award if you're not in the show...and for me, there in lies the problem...I can't even get into the shows.

Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Esther,
Great idea about skimming through FAV contest entries to get an idea about how judges feel and what the judging process involves....I'm going to try it....and then perhaps I can see where I would fit in...LOL

Kim,
Your story about the painting over the size limits being excepted makes me angry. If I were your friend I would have made an issue of it. If no one calls them on the carpet for it then it will continue. Grrrr .... stuff like that just makes me mad.

One of my art associations just had a juried show and they told the juror that unless the work is really poor quality they wanted most of the pieces to be accepted. This is not ideal either but at least most people got to show their work. I won't be over there for a few weeks so I'm anxious to see who got awards.

I have really mixed feelings about entering competitions and all of that....yes it is great to get an award but knowing the jury selection process and how subjective things are it makes me a little jaded...of course...I don't usually win awards....

I have noticed at the local show that I curate every year when we have a people's choice...the larger pieces are always chosen....so I kind of like the "big and red" idea LOL
Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
OOPs...clarification on previous post...."excepted" could also mean "accepted" in the paragraph to Kim....of cource I was thinking they made an exception for the larger piece...LOL
Kim
via fineartviews.com
Monte, one of the most satisfying exhibition experiences I've had lately was a small, regional exhibit I participated in where there was no competition involved, only stipulation was that the work pertained to a specific theme. It was at a small university art gallery and it really put things on a different plane when I went to the opening reception. The fact that there was no arbitrary hierarchy imposed by jurying and awards meant that the viewer perceived the show to be a level playing field where each piece was free to be enjoyed for what it was, and you thought about the theme of the show and how each artist interpreted that theme rather than who was awarded and who wasn't. Perhaps you might check around your area for a similar type of exhibition. or organize one with other artists in your community.
Monte Wilson
via fineartviews.com
Kim- I have participated in local shows both juried and non-juried. Lost interest, the same people kept winning show after show. After awhile I figured what's the point? I mean I saw works (by other artists) in some of these shows that were out of this world fantastic and absolutely been given awards but didn't even make honorable mention. The common denominator? They weren't part of the 'click'. Now on to the larger regional shows. There are a few I've tried to get into for years with no success. Then I look at the entries that made it and the majority of them deserve to be there...but then there's that 15 percent or so that makes you say "What!?". I've come to the realization that most of these shows are a complete waste of my money....

Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Monte,
I have a very talented and well known (at least in NE PA) artist friend who refuses to enter local competitions for just the reasons you describe.

I haven't found that to be true in all cases although there are a few local artists that do win many awards. However, the quality of their work is exceptional as well.

I have often thought that it is good to have a mentor or person routing for you to get into some of the bigger art societies....but I don't know if I am correct in that assumption either...

Kim,
The show I curate every year is just what you describe. We jury for space and honestly I have never had to turn anyone away. The quality of the work in the show seems to get better each year and people generally comment on what a great show it is and that the quality is as good or better than shows in the BIG CITIES at the well known galleries. Last year we had 108 pieces and sold 16. That was wonderful in a down economy! For the last 2 years we have had a "People's Choice" award where visitors to the show get to vote for their favorite piece. I always reserve my vote to be the tie breaker should a tie occur but haven't had to exercise it as the winner is always many votes ahead of the rest! Some pieces really do stand out and speak to the viewing audience. (of course we always have those folks who bring their family and friends and try to load the ballot box but that strategy has not brought them awards)

The best thing about this local show is that people who just do art for a hobby enter and some of their work is amazing and they are so thrilled to be in the show. It is a community event which everyone enjoys!
George De Chiara
via fineartviews.com
Judy,
Your story reminded me of a few years ago when I was at the AWS traveling show and was looking at one of the pieces that placed very high in the awards category (I can't recall the exact award it won right now). I bumped into the artist and we got to talking a bit about her piece. She told me that this piece was rejected from the last few shows she tried to enter it in and now it won an award from a major art society...
Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Monte,
I checked out your website and the paintings are lovely. Perhaps you should just pick a few regional shows to persist at. Eventually you will get in. I have tried for a few at the state level and been rejected. I have gotten into regional shows but it is all very subjective. Keep plugging away if it is important to you. Otherwise, just paint because you love it and to heck with the critics!
Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Kim,
Just curious why you don't post a link to your website? You sound like you have lots of experience. Would love to see your work. I always click on the links in this blog to check out the work. It is so interesting to see everyones work. Most of us are looking for exposure...even if it is only other artists! Many of the artists collect other artists so it is a good venue as well.
Kim
via fineartviews.com
Joanne, I haven't linked to my website because I made it myself after taking a local economic development workshop to learn web design and I still have a few things yet to do to it before I feel comfortable getting it fully submitted to the search engines--especially after reading a few blogs here on things to do to your website to make it better! It's still in web construction limbo land for now. I hope to have it up by the end of the summer. But I do enter a painting or two every month in the FAV competition, so you can see a few of my paintings here entered as 'Kimberly Reed-Deemer.' Click on my entry name and it brings up all the things I;ve entered so far.
Judy Mudd
via fineartviews.com
George,
That doesn't surprise me. I think if you hit enough targets, sooner or later something will stick! You just have to find the right judge at the right time. Of course, your painting has to be good to begin with, but then it is hitting the moment and time that a judge will be impressed with your work. You never know what will move a particular judge on a particular day. I've heard judges say, "ask me tomorrow and I would probably change my mind."
Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Esther, Skimmed the July entries and I see what you mean. It didn't take me long to go through the ones that didn't immediately speak to me!

Kim, I liked your horses! Good luck!
Kim
via fineartviews.com
Thanks, Joanne! More often than not, if I do something else before the end of the month that I like better, I replace it!
Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Marsha,

I agree. The problem I thinks is especially compounded by those of us who produce only a few paintings a month. It's like banishing one of your children! Maybe the key is to paint often and produce a lot and then we can be more subjective than protective!

Michael

Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Kim,

You bring up an interesting point. I have heard of situations where submissions were rejected when the work itself didn't look substantially like the digital image submitted. Playing with contrasts, color saturation etc. might make for a better JPEG but if the actual work is different it shouldn't be allowed in.

Michael

Lori Woodward
via fineartviews.com
Steve,
This is an excellent and much needed post! Thanks for taking the time to share your insights and experience with us.



Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Yesterday I was going through one of my older sketchbooks and found a print-out from a juror, Vito-Leonard Scarola, professor of art at Saddleback College in Mission Viejo, California. He issued his statement on the judging of a figural competition for one of my art associations I am in. It was very helpful to me at the time and I forgot I had this. Here on this article, I earlier complained that the future jurors need to spell criteria out a little more clearly. Well, here I had the clarity in print the whole time. So, in reading it again, it reverberated different bits of knowledge that I hadn't absorbed before. You know how you read a book, it helps you in some ways and years later when you read it again, there is a whole new understanding? That is what happened to me yesterday, I realized that I had grown a little artwise. I can't place the statement here, it is nearly 4 pages long with his added biography. I am sure this took a lot of time for Leonard to prepare. Here are several things he gives as advise on being rejected with some of my corrections in minor spelling and punctuation.
"Never give up, Try, try again and continue to learn."
"In evaluating works of art, the questions often come up as to whether or not jurors base their selective process on their personal biases or tastes such as likes or dislikes for a particular style of painting, media, trend or subject matter, etc... Do universal aesthetic standards exist for evaluating works of art? If so, are they consistent and do jurors often use them? Can one rely on them? I believe the answer to all these questions is yes. As you can see the selective process can be rather complex and of course somewhat confusing to some with so many seemingly contradictory points of views. Be assured that the evaluation process varies from juror to juror with divergence in background and experience and is not to be taken personally or as definitive."
"Nevertheless, I do believe that universal truths eist. In particular, there is a belief that most judges would agree is paramount in evaluating works of art and that is the concept of "quality". Unfortunately, the criteria used in defining quality may be just as elusive as the multitude of criteria used by different judges in defining art itself. However, I will attempt to clarify some of these truths and give you my interpretation of "quality".
"My basic premise or definition of "Quality" is directly correlated to the degree that the artist demonstrates his or her skill in turning the commonplace into the sublime."
"I trust this definition and what follows will be helpful in your understanding the reasons as to why the particular pieces have been chosen to be represented in this exhibition."
"In evaluating drawings and paintings for a group exhibition I generally use four simple phrases to help me categorize the work to be included or excluded." "They are:
1. Wow!
2. It works
3. It works but...
4 It doesn"t work."
"Usually, of the four categories, pieces that are in the last two categories do not get into the exhibition."
That is all for now. Next, Leonard Scarola goes on to define what ingredients compose the above phrases. This is where it gets longer and I will have to scan this and put it on my website blog I guess. I need to ask the professor if it is okay. If he is not on vacation. This was up on the internet 3 years ago and it still may be. I will check the html string to be sure.

With respect to Stephen Doherty, I still feel you have a fantastic viewpoint with all of your experience to share here also. It all helps, we need all the info we can get. Thank-you so much.


Esther J. Williams
via fineartviews.com
Hip, hip, hooray, the link is still active! Here is is on the Laguna Plein Air Painter`s Association website:
http://www.lpapa.org/goFigure/goFigure_statement.html

Enjoy and paint masterpieces!

Carol Schmauder
via fineartviews.com
Thanks so much for sharing the link Esther. I look forward to reading the article by Professor Scarola.

Kim
via fineartviews.com
Thanks, Esther--I will definitely take a look!
Carole Rodrigue
via fineartviews.com
Thank you for the wonderful advice! I have often refrained from entering some competitions because I've felt that the judges would choose works which are similar to their own style, i.e. portraits, or impressionism . . . Maybe some judges do chose according to their own preferred style, but I will try to keep in mind, not always. Thanks!
George De Chiara
via fineartviews.com
I remember when I was studying with Irving Shapiro many years ago and we got to talking about how he picks work for shows when he's the judge. He mentioned he would skip work that looked like the artist was trying to catch his attention by painting in the same style as him. Obviously every juror is different, but I've always kept this in mind when entering shows. And just for the record - I can't tell if it's helped or not.
Kim
via fineartviews.com
Interesting anecdote, George. He was the director of the Amer. Acad. of Art in Chicago when I attended so many, many moons ago, but I didn't know him. It just seems so counter-intuitive to me that a juror would consciously avoid a piece that they perceive to be similar to their own-? I would think they'd feel a bit of a connection to it rather than being turned off. I would not necessarily assume the artist was deliberately trying to catch the juror's attention, only that they happen to do work that is more similar than other artists.
George De Chiara
via fineartviews.com
Hi Kim,
Nice to run into another AAA grad. I was always a little puzzled by this comment too, but I think he was referring to works that are very similar to his. Almost to the point where you have to look at the signature to see who painted it. Of course it just may have been his way of pushing us to find our own style...


Kim
via fineartviews.com
George, in honesty I didn't graduate. I attended full time for a year and then transferred to a university art program, but I have to say how valuable the daily life drawing regimen at the AAA was. I found commuting 3 hours each day on the train to get there was a problem in terms of time, however, so that was one of the reasons I transferred. It was too difficult to put the needed time into the assignments when so much of my day was spent traveling. My brother also attended the academy in the 1960's, which is how I found out about it.
Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Hi All,

Have not been reading my mail the last few days and am trying to catch up. As to juror bias, intend, directions etc. I think that the best way to approach this and remain sane and motivated is know that even presenting your best work is still a crap shoot because you have no idea what the juror is going to be looking for, what their interests are or what they really like unless you know them personally! It's ok to feel bad if rejected but don't take it personal, find another competition, and keep moving forward.

Michael

PS. of course there is always bribery! :)

Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Kim,

You make an excellent point. I know I have seen works that not only didn't conform to the prospectus and should have been rejected but won awards to boot!

Michael

Jill Banks
via fineartviews.com
I try to get a pretty good "picture" of each of the competitions I enter... looking at past winners and researching the selection process and jurors and jurors of awards. There are some jurors who consistently give awards to students or cronies or students of cronies. Shame on them! It's understandable if this occasionally happens -- but over and over? Others, the good ones, listen to the show criteria and carefully consider all the applicants and pieces fairly and thoughtfully. It's so terrific to hear their input about the award winners and selection process. My preference is for there to be a single juror. Multiple jurors tend to require lots of compromise and diplomacy -- not necessarily leading to the best show. Given the tremendous fees that many competitions charge for each entry and costs involved with shipping work, sponsoring organizations should really check out the jurors they hire and provide clear guidance to ensure fair practices.

Max Hulse
via fineartviews.com
Stephen An excellent article with some
unusual but significant points that I never
would have considered.

I will print this out and refer to it many
times no doubt.


Thanks
Max Hulse
Max Hulse
via fineartviews.com
I have reread your fine article, and recalled
a juried show where I entered three pieces and
all were accepted. My friend had 2 excellent
pieces that were definitely superior to mine,
and both were cut. The next year he entered
the same pieces in the same show and won best
of show!
Go figure!!
Max Hulse









 

FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database

 

FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved