Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life

Blog


« FineArtStudioOnline Integrates Facebook Like Buttons | Main | Selected Upcoming Exhibits by Informed Collector Artists »


Follow this Blog



Subscribe to our Newsletter



Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip

 

Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

















abstract art
acrylic painting
advice for artists
art and culture
art and psychology
art and society
art appreciation
art blogging advice
Art Business
art challenge
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art fairs
art forum
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art website design
art website tips
art websites
Art World
art world problems
artist resume advice
artist statement
artist tribute
artist website tips
artist websites
assemblage
BoldBrush
BoldBrush Interview
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
BrushBuzz
Canvoo
Carolyn Henderson
Carrie Turner
cityscape painting
Clint Watson
collage
colored pencil
conceptual art
Connie Tom
copyright
creativity
Daniel Keys
Dealing with art forgery
Deber Klein
digital art
drawing
email newsletters
encaustic painting
etching
exhibiting art online
exposure tips
Facebook
FASO
FASO Art News
FASO Daily Art Show
FASO Featured Artists
figure painting
FineArtViews
FineArtViews Interview Series
functional art
Gayle Faucette Wisbon
glass art
Google
Guest Posts
Holiday
InformedCollector
inspiration
installation art
Instruction
Internet Scams
Jack White
Keith Bond
landscape painting
Linda Mikulich
Lisa Call
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Matthew Mahler
mixed media
Moshe Mikanovsky
oil painting
online art competitions
online art groups
originality
painting
pastel
photography
Pinterest
plein air painting
politics
portraits
pottery
pricing artwork
printmaking
realism
religion
Robert Genn
Sarah Maple
sculpting
sculpture
seascape
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
social networking
still life art
street art
support local art
Think Tank
tips for exhibiting art
Twitter
watercolor
watermarks
websites for artists
western art
wildlife art




 Archives:Sep 2014
Aug 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
Apr 2014
Mar 2014
Feb 2014
Jan 2014
Dec 2013
Nov 2013
Oct 2013
Sep 2013
Aug 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sep 2012
Aug 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Apr 2012
Mar 2012
Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005

 

SEO For Artists: On-Page SEO vs. Off-Page SEO

by Clint Watson on 4/23/2010 9:50:32 AM

This article is by Clint Watson,  former art gallery owner/director/salesperson and founder of FineArtViews. You should follow Clint on Twitter here.


"SEO" is short for "Search Engine Optimization." 

 SEO is a collection of practices that are intended to "optimize" a website for maximum visibility in search engine results....and I say "search engines" to be nice to Bing, Yahoo and the others - in 2010 SEO basically means you're trying to rank at the top of the results in Google for various searches.  My standard disclaimer:  SEO is not a great use of marketing time for most artists, and there are a ton of other, more important things you should be doing instead....but.....since everybody seems to want to know this stuff and ignores my disclaimers anyway - here we go.
In my last article, I outlined some of the factors that we think Google uses to determine how to rank search results.  This needs some more discussion.  After all, if you're going to "optimize" your website for something, it helps to know the factors you're optimizing for.
What you need to understand is that there are actually two types of SEO -  on-page SEO and off-page SEO.  
On Page SEO vs. Off Page SEO
On-Page SEO refers to things that you can control on your website.  
It is easier because,well, you can control everything on your website.   You don't have to get other third parties involved.  Unfortunately, for most searches, on-page SEO is not nearly as important as the other type of SEO:  Off-Page SEO. 
Off-Page SEO refers to things that other people do and/or say about you and your website.  
It is much more difficult because you have to convince or entice other people to do things....to take actions......that will help your website rank better.  Most SEO experts agree that Google places a lot more emphasis on the factors we target with Off-Page SEO 
(There are sometimes exceptions to this in the case of a new search term that Google has not seen before).
So let's re-organize (and add to) our list, dividing it up between on-page and off-page factors.

On Page SEO Factors:
  1. Do the search terms appear on the page? If so, where?
  2. Do the search terms appear in the title tag of the page?
  3. Is the IP Address hosting the domain trustworthy...or is it known to host spammers?
  4. Does the content of the page appear to be copied from somewhere else?
  5. Does the content of this page appear multiple times on the domain? If so, how do I know which copy to show in the results?
  6. Do the search terms appear in the domain for this page?
  7. Do the search terms appear in the URL for this page?
  8. Does the page appear to be engaging in malicious or manipulative practices? 
  9. Does the page appear to be buying links? - if so - Google will penalize the site
Off Page SEO Factors:
  1. How many external links are pointing to this page?
  2. Do the external links come from a diversity of sources? *
  3. How old is the domain that this page resides on?
  4. Do the external links come from sources that Google trusts? *
  5. Do the external link sources have lots of links pointing to them?
  6. Does the anchor text of the external links pointing to the page contain the search term? *
  7. Is the domain one that Google trusts?
* The asterisks indicate the most important factors in SEO for most searches.
As you can see, the top three factors have nothing to do with anything on your page that you can directly control!  See why I say SEO is not a great use of your time?  The time an energy you spend trying to get external links with the right anchor text could pay off more dividends if spend crafting a great email newsletter to your fans (and might get you some links anyway!).
Anyway - I thought it would be good before we embark on this journey to have an overview of what we're trying to accomplish.
Sincerely,
Clint Watson
Software Craftsman and Art Fanatic










[Services:
FASO: Want Your Art Career to Grow?  Set up an Artist Website with FASO.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $12,500 in awards. 

Daily Art Show: Daily Show of Art that reaches thousands of potential collectors.

Backstory: About Clint. Email EditorTwitter. Republish. ]


Related Posts:

SEO for Artists: Structuring URLs


Topics: SEO for Artist Websites

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 30 Comments

Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Clint, I agree with you there are few things an individual cn do to entertain search engines except be engaged in the internet and linking to your other websites and interest youare envolved with. They all do wonderful work and are very savey about real links. Thank you for giving us more information to help us in what we can do to help search engines notice us.

Sharon Weaver
via fineartviews.com
Are off-page the same as backlinks? There seems to be a lot of different ways cropping up on the web to get more backlinks.

Charlotte Herczfeld
via fineartviews.com
Clint, thanks, this is interesting, if difficult. I'm so happy I can leave it in your capable hands, and I do believe you, especially as believing you makes my life easier. :-)

I recently saw a poll asking artists through what manner they made their sales, and from blog or website was *low* on the list. Top two were through galleries, and through own DIY exhibitions, cafés, etc. In other words, where people and the paintings are in the same room/location at the same time, physically. Seems to me that it is wise to spend most effort on what yields the undisputably best results.

Still very interesting to read your explanations. Thanks.

Carol Schmauder
via fineartviews.com
This all seems like a complicated dance one plays with the search engines. Painting and networking seems like a better use of time than figuring out how to work the off-page SEO factors. Thanks for your insight Clint.

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Sharon - yes off page links are sometimes called backlinks because they link "back" to your website - there are lots of ways to get them - but steer clear of anything fishy and especially anything that requires payments - Google will slap a site down hard if the site pays for links. Also, leaving comments on blogs, etc doesn't usually count because those links typically are "NOFOLLOWED" which I'll cover in a later article but a "NOFOLLOWED" link doesn't count for SEO Purposes.

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Charlotte - I agree - in our own polling email newsletters were pretty high up too - I agree that other activities are much higher payoff than SEO - it's a low return activity for most artists (it is a *high* return activity for some other types of websites though - just not most artists).

Judy Mudd
via fineartviews.com
Thanks, Clint. This clears up a lot. I can understand your stance on not spending a lot of time worrying about SEO instead of your art. THIS is why I recommend your websites to people.

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Thanks Judy - Ironically we've spent a lot of time adding a bunch of SEO features to our sites - mainly because people constantly focus on it (when they shoudn't) and because adding a lot of the on-page stuff was easy for us to do in a way that doesn't require a lot of time from the artists - the off page stuff gets harder though because getting backlinks does take some effort from the site owner

Smadar Barnea
via fineartviews.com
Hi Clint, I'm a photographer and have only just started to try marketing my art. To this end, I've started reading about blogging, websites, SEO etc. I stumbled upon your blogs a few days ago and, after reading some, have subscribed to follow.
This latest article has been an eye-opener, because it has shifted the weight from all the SEO-talk to CONTENT. That SHOULD always be the most important ingredient in the blog, but gets overwhelmed by all the technical stuff about keywords, links etc. I realize these are important and should not be overlooked, but I think even the most well-planned blog won't make the grade, if it's not interesting enough. Telling us frankly that we don't have all that much control over the search engines, brings us back to the heart of things: If you want to be heard, say something enough people will want to hear. So - thanks!

Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Clint, Thank you for all your incites regarding search engines. They are completely independent and can't be manipulated. We are all at their feet and need to be mindful of our internet positions affected by them.

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Smadar - I love that "if you want to be heard, say somthing enough people will want to hear" - I've tweeted your quote here:

http://twitter.com/clintavo/status/12966231516

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Helen - sort of correct - search engines are independent but they can be manipulated to an extent - that's sort of the whole premise of "SEO" - the problem is that serious SEO is difficult, time consuming and expensive - thus....not a good payoff for most artists. I would say the increasing amount of high-ranking crap/spam sites would indicate that some manipulation is taking place though.

Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Clint, Manipulations will be recognized by search engines and will go no where long term

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Helen - Well it depends - one could argue that setting up URLs, begging for links and changing your title tags is a form of manipulation - however, if you use manipulations that the search engines have "banned" then you are correct.....sort of......you'll get banned if you're a little guy - but the "big" manipulators sometimes get away with it (mahalo.com, ehow.com, demand media backed sites) - but those are of little concern to most artists. The truth of it is that Google allows some manipulation through because they make 90 percent of their revenue via adwords - and adword driven sites tend to be some of the worst spam/manipulation out there. I wish I had a version of google that returned all the same search results EXCEPT any site with adsense on it - that would solve a lot of the spam, but of course that's not realistic since that would leave them with zero revenue.

Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Clint, your observances
well taken, however, I believe google and other search engines are not completely susceptible to wealth gain but, devoted to web service to internet web sites and other internet interest.

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Helen - Maybe not *completely* susceptible; however, Mahalo is breaking all kinds of rules that should have gotten them banned long ago - but they are generating millions for Google, so....I'm wondering....why haven't they been banned? I'm left with only one conclusion - revenue....The big search engines have a lot of people and servers to pay for so they are businesses concerned with revenue unlike their early days - I'm not saying they're "evil" - but not totally just devoted to philanthropic service either. Just something to be aware of, not something that will affect most artists most likely.

Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Clint, I am not at all familiar with Mahalo; I can't comment on this or how Google may be involved but, I do know google has been very helpful to me and my website and would not guestion their interest in the internet.Clint, as an internet invester, you would know that there have to be rewards to keep investing in the internet.As a very successful online fineart investor you know the value of your customers as does google. I am very thankful for both of you

Spencer Meagher
via fineartviews.com
Clint,
Can't thank you enough for the wealth of knowledge you share. It seems to be so complex, but I'm confident the fundamentals are not out of reach for those artists who want to succeed. The education you provide is of much greater value than any I would get from a university.

Natasha Isenhour
via fineartviews.com
This is why I'm with YOU! Thank you Clint for unraveling some of this mysterious world for us. Your creative talent and understanding of the cyber-world take a lot of weight off of this artist for sure!

Helen Horn Musser
via fineartviews.com
Natasha, Ditto that for Clint

Stede
via fineartviews.com
Hi Clint,
Thank you! I'll stick with your disclaimer. For me, the best part of this article, and people's comments, is help with prioritizing. I recently attended a Social Media Workshop for Artists by Pat and Melinda of Convivial Design in Abiquiu, and at the top of the TO DO list was...strategize. Help like this with understanding the time investment and likely results help tremendously with deciding where to invest precious time, and how best to connect my art with the people it's meant for.

Thank you again!

Stede

Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Hi Clint,

Thanks for this installment. Have not been overly concerned at this point with SEO. IU realize at this stage of the game most people aren't looking for me. Art first (or content first) and then worry about this later.

Thanks,

Michael


Diane Tasselmyer
via fineartviews.com
Clint,
what the heck is #4. what do you mean by "copied from somewhere else"?


I create stuff in wordpad and copy and past into my blog or other things.

Or are you referring "copied" as plagerism?

??????????????

Clint Watson
via fineartviews.com
Diane - I mean copied from another website....as in plagerism (although there are sometimes legitimate uses of copying from another site - syndicated articles, quoting somebody under fair use, etc).

Sharon Weaver
via fineartviews.com
This was a great discussion with lots of good info and insight. Good one, Clint.

Dianne Panarelli Miller
via fineartviews.com
Thank you Lori for something I can tell the countless people who ask me to donate a painting almost weekly. It always makes me feel uncomfortable to say no and now I have a wonderful way of educating these people and maybe making money for the both of us!

Barb Stachow
via fineartviews.com
Donations of artwork is always easily passed off as being...only paper. What about all the money and time we artist put into it, that must count for something, I like the idea of donating money for tax purposes and keeping the painting. Or better yet, posting the painting with a price and donate a share of the income with the group.

Karen Winters
via fineartviews.com
I do numerous charities every year - but the ones I like best are the shared percentage of sales - not outright donations. I only do one of those because the organizer is a friend.

I had a recent request for a 100 percent donation of a painting. When I said sorry, no, they offered to buy it and then auctioned it off for 2x the value. It was a win-win for all of us.

Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Karen,

good for you for holding out for what is best. I'm sure it also worked out better for the auction since the charity had some skin in the game and knew what the worth of your work was!

Michael


 

FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database

 

FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved