Artist Websites  Artist Websites |  Featured Artists |  Art Marketing  Art Marketing |  Art Contest |  BrushBuzz |  InformedCollector |  FASO Loves You - Share Your Art, Share Life


« The New Branding | Main | Stephanie Birdsall ~ Sophisticated representational work that resonates with deep passion. »


Follow this Blog



Subscribe to our Newsletter



Quick Links

Artist Websites and Good Design
How to Sell Art
How to Get Your Art Noticed by Galleries
SEO For Artists - The Ultimate Tip

 

Blog Roll

Mikki Senkarik's Blog

















Topical Index

Current
advice for artists
art appreciation
Art Business
art challenge
art collectors
art criticism
art education
art gallery tips
art history
art law
art marketing
art museums
art website design
art websites
Art World
artist tribute
artist website tips
artist websites
BoldBrush Interview
BoldBrush Winners
Brian Sherwin
BrushBuzz
Canvoo
Carolyn Henderson
Clint Watson
Connie Tom
copyright
creativity
Daniel Keys
Deber Klein
email newsletters
exposure tips
Facebook
FASO
FASO Art News
FineArtViews
FineArtViews Interview Series
Google
Guest Posts
InformedCollector
inspiration
Instruction
Jack White
Keith Bond
Linda Mikulich
Lisa Call
Lori Woodward
Luann Udell
Matthew Mahler
Moshe Mikanovsky
online art groups
originality
painting
politics
pricing artwork
religion
Robert Genn
Sarah Maple
sculpting
sell art
selling art online
selling fine art online
SEO for Artist Websites
social networking
street art
support local art
Think Tank
Twitter
websites for artists




 Archives:Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Oct 2006
Sep 2006
Aug 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006
Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005

 

Thoughts on Approaching Galleries

by Keith Bond on 1/4/2010 3:08:19 PM

This article is by Keith Bond, Regular contributing writer for FineArtViews.  You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.


Scott Jones recently wrote a great article about approaching galleries.  There were many great insights.  Scott and other gallery owners / directors like him truly love art and enjoy discovering new artists.  As such, they will take the time to review artists’ portfolios because they genuinely want to see the work.  I don’t think all gallerists are as open as him, but many are.

Gallery Owners Are Bombarded With Submissions

 There is, however, a dilemma that is unavoidable.  Good galleries have hundreds or thousands of submissions.  This makes their task difficult and time consuming.  Even with the best of intentions, a thorough review of a given artist’s work is unlikely.  First impressions are critical.  Even then, sometimes gallery owners are so bogged down, a portfolio may be given only a cursory glance.

An Example

A couple years ago, I submitted my portfolio to a gallery for consideration.  A short while later I received a reply stating something to the effect of, “Thank you for your interest in our gallery.  Although your work is of high quality, it is not what we are looking for at this time.”  It seemed to me like a form letter.  Perhaps the owner really looked at my portfolio, perhaps not.  I don’t know. 

However, a few months later, the same gallery owner saw one of my paintings at an invitational show.  He loved the painting.  After visiting my website, he telephoned me to invite me to participate in an annual show he has at his gallery.  He mentioned a few paintings by name from the website.  Interestingly, a couple of those same images were sent in the portfolio.  Through our telephone conversation, it seemed apparent that he had no recollection of the portfolio.

This could be easily be explained by a few possibilities.  One possibility is that he really didn’t take the time to look at my portfolio.  But let’s give him the benefit of the doubt.  Let’s assume he really did view my portfolio.  Perhaps he even liked some of it, but wasn’t interested in adding me as a gallery artist.  With hundreds of other portfolios viewed in the meantime, it is understandable that he didn’t remember mine.

But what made the difference?  Why did he like my art the second time?  I think it boils down to one thing: he saw my work in person.  Maybe there are other reasons, but I think this is the biggest.

The piece he saw touched him.  He loved it.  With that feeling toward my art and a recollection of my style, he had a different frame of mind while looking through my website.  As good as a photo may be, it doesn’t do justice to an original painting.  He had experienced my original work just enough to be somewhat familiar with my technique and style.  Thus, despite the shortcomings of the digital images, he had a better idea of my work.  What he saw before, he now saw with new eyes.  He associated an experience with my original art and transferred that experience to the viewing of my digital images.

Another example of this principle actually happened several years earlier.  I had sent my portfolio to a gallery.  I telephoned a week or so later to follow up.  I don’t recall the conversation, but the short of it was that he wasn’t ready to add me, but wasn’t completely dismissing me either.  I mentioned that I would be in the area in a few weeks and wondered if he would set up an appointment to view actual works.  He obliged and when he saw the works in person a few weeks later he liked what he saw.  I joined the gallery that day.

I guess my point is this: viewing original works is always better than digital images, prints, or slides.  Unfortunately, this isn’t always possible.  This does create a dilemma.  Some gallery owners are willing to set up an appointment to view original works, but some aren’t. Remember, they are very busy.

So, what to do?

Be Respectful

Respect the gallery’s time.  Respect the gallery’s preferred method of submissions.  Be understanding of their situation.  Follow their guidelines and preferences.  Reread Scott’s article.

Follow Up

Once you have given the owner adequate time to review the portfolio, follow up with them.  If possible, a telephone call is better than email.  Again, be respectful of their wishes and time.  As Scott mentioned, don’t call when the gallery is involved in a show.  You may wish to email and ask when the best time to call would be.  You run the risk of them saying not to call, though. 

Another option is to call and say something to the effect of: “I know you are busy and I wish to respect your time.  If now doesn’t work for you, when would be the best time for me to call back?” 

From my experience, they will most likely take the time to visit right then.  They recognize your awareness and respect of their time.  This puts you in better standing with them.  They likely would also rather not postpone the visit.  Sometimes, though, they may request that you call at another time.  If so, try to set a phone appointment.

Request a Personal Appointment

Once you are able to visit on the phone, three outcomes are likely.  1) They add you as an artist. Great!  But, unlikely.  2) They say no. Your work isn’t a fit for the gallery.  3) There is some interest, but maybe or maybe not. 

If you find yourself in this third scenario then direct the conversation to ask for an appointment to show original works.  Remember the reasons I mentioned above.  You may choose to say something like: “I know that you recognize that digital images can have limitations.  They reveal only so much.  Viewing the originals will give you a better feel for my technique and style.  The brushwork, color, and subtleties will be more evident.  Will you be willing to set up an appointment to spend a few minutes viewing my works in person?”

Final Thought

Visiting with a gallery who is “on the fence” with your work may or may not result in representation.  I have had more than one experience where the gallery didn’t add me at that time, but the owner or director and I had a pleasant meeting.  They liked my work enough to ask that I continue to keep them posted.  They requested that I email them from time to time and that there was a real likelihood of being seriously considered in the future.  From the visit, it was evident that it was a genuine interest, not just a dismissal (I’ve had plenty of those, too).

One last comment, don’t be pushy.  If there is no interest, it is a waste of both your and their time to pursue it.  Move on.  Find a gallery that is a better fit for your work.

Sincerely,

Keith Bond  



[Services:
FASO: Want Your Art Career to Grow?  Set up an Artist Website with FASO.
FineArtViews: Straight talk about art marketing, inspiration - daily to your inbox.

InformedCollector: Free daily briefs about today's finest artists in your inbox.

BoldBrush Contest: Monthly Online Painting Contest with over $6,000 in awards. 

Backstory: About Clint. Email Editor.  Submit a guest post.  Twitter. Republish. ]


Related Posts:

12 Steps to Get Your Artwork Noticed by Galleries

Art Galleries: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Negotiating with Art Galleries

Gallery Representation

Negotiating With Galleries - Part 3

Advice From a Gallery Manager

The Benefits of Gallery Representation

Art Galleries

Why Galleries Rock

Negotiating with Art Galleries - Part 2


Topics: Gallery/Artist Relationship | Keith Bond 

What Would You Like to Do Next?
Post your comment Join Email List Follow via RSS Share Share

 55 Comments

Anne Watson
via fineartviews.com
I have a question regarding the etiquette around multiple gallery submissions. Say for example there are 3 competing galleries in a city and an artist is interested in all of them. It seems that many galleries specify applying via email only, and that it may take 2-3 months for a reply. Is it best for the artist to approach her top choice first, wait for a reply, and then move on down the list? Otherwise one runs the risk of having interest from more than one, and then having to say, "sorry, I've gone with another gallery". But of course it would be more expedient to apply to many places all at once. I know that for writers there are certain rules of etiquette regarding manuscript submissions, and wondered if there are a different set of guidelines for artists.

Leslie Saeta
via fineartviews.com
I really enjoyed Scott's article. His advice about finding a way to get your art in front of a gallery owner is so important! I had a very similar experience this past summer. I was hoping to be selected to show my works at a very successful restaurant in town. I met with the owner one day and left my card as she asked to see my website. When I followed up a few weeks later she remembered my site but commented "I am not sure your art will sell here. I wasn't ready to take no for an answer so I pulled out my portfolio. She still hesitated but I asked if I could bring in a few paintings. She agreed and I came in the next day with my artwork. She booked my show on the spot. I was lucky and sold 22 paintings at the show six months later!
The owner did tell me that she thought I needed better photos of my art and that I should redo my website. She said my paintings looked so much better in person. So, I took her advice and redid my website last year as well!
Sandra Reid
via clintwatson.net
I would just like to add that computer monitors all vary in colour and brightness so even though you think your art looks fantastic on your website it can often look shocking when viewed on another computer monitor. Hence the reason why it is always important to encourage people to see your work in person.




Candy Barr
via fineartviews.com
This newsletter definitely has some great networking and professional tips. Getting viewers rewarded by participating and making comments is excellent idea. Kudos
Michael Cardosa
via fineartviews.com
Keith, thank you again for another excellent article.

I've been in sales for many years and one of the things that always worked well and still does is networking and recommendations. I think it's vitally important to understand the business of the gallery that you are interested in and try to do some research on who some of their top artists might be. Approaching a fellow artist on what might be the best way to work with the gallery owner will give you some good insight as to the real operations there and if the other artist likes your work and doesn't seemed threatened by it they might even make a recommendation to the owner to take a look at what you have. An inside recommendation will almost always trump a nice portfolio or so I believe. Again, pick your galleries wisely and your artists and make sure that your work is up to professional standards.

Just another idea to try.

Poppy Balser
via fineartviews.com
I have certainly had better response to personally presenting my artwork at the gallery (with an appointment, this really is a must!)

I am curious as to the answer about the submitting process to multiple galleries, it is something I have been wrestling with as well.

Clint, thanks for the newletter, it is a wonderful resource.
K. Henderson
via clintwatson.net
It's not always possible to show your work in person if you are wanting to show in far away places. But my advice is never give up. Just because a gallery doesn't accept you the first time you submit doesn't mean they won't take you the second time (or the 3rd or 4th)

And to answer Anne's question, when I'm wanting to show in a specific area, I submit to multiple galleries at one time.
Louise B. Hafesh
via clintwatson.net
Tagging onto Sandra's comment, in addition to varied color calibration of monitors, your website fonts may not appear as they do on your computer, especially if your site was created on a Mac and the viewer is using a PC.

I realized that certain typefaces don't read the same when I entered my website from another computer. My headlines, which were specked at 72 point script so as to be clearly readable, were substituted with 72 point Bodoni extra bold. I don't have to tell you how gauche that looked; it literally screamed!. Have since learned to lock in my script as artwork so that it doesn't change from one computer to the next.
Filomena Booth
via clintwatson.net
If after the first visit, the gallery director is interested but has not committed, I suggest the artist send a monthly email newsletter to keep the gallery informed of new work and upcoming shows. Any follow-up visits or calls shouldn't be met with amnesia.

Carol Schmauder
via fineartviews.com
Thanks for your article on approaching galleries, Keith. It is a great follow-up to the article by Scott Jones. I have done some work with galleries over the years, but very little, and all the advise gives me more confidence about how to approach galleries.

Michael Cardosa
via clintwatson.net
To comment on Anne's question for multiple galleries. I believe that if the scenario is truly that all 3 galleries are equal in quality and clientèle and you can't work with all three, then any one would be more than acceptable. I'd approach all three at once. Why wait weeks or months for each to respond? This is the part that is business. Waiting would only put you behind where you want to be and allow someone else to control your business. I think the best thing that could happen is that one of the three galleries wanted to represent you and did. Isn't this what you really want? If you have to tell they others (nicely) that you're now represented by someone else I would think that one, they'd respect your work even more and two, they will take you more seriously next time they see your work and remember a lost opportunity.

Just my thoughts.

Esther J. Williams
via clintwatson.net
The past few days I have been searching many art galleries on the internet to see if I would fit in first, then I sent an email asking about their artist submission process. So far I have not received one reply. I will keep trying, but it seems to me that I need to hit the pavement in the town I am interested in being represented in. I am in southern CA where there is so much competition, it is very hard to get into a quality gallery. They are always full of the signature/established artists and haven`t anymore room. The ones available to me are galleries that are co-ops and ask for monthly fees and sitting time. I am in one of those, but would like to be in a 'real gallery.' Asking other artists for referrals is like asking that artist to bump their best friend off, everyone is waiting in line, there are waiting lists for even some of the better co-op galleries in Laguna Beach. So, I decided to branch out towards Los Angeles today and outlying regions. I now feel like I have released myself from an enclosed capsule. I think it will be best for me to take a trip to those areas I am interested in first and ask questions. Doing research on the internet at least saves my feet a lot of pain. This year I am co-directing an outdoor art exhibition in Newport Beach`s Back Bay and I hope to meet a gallery owner there who will take interest in my art. I've seen gallery owner`s walk up to ask about a specific artist at exhibitions and later they are signed up. This applying to galleries is hard work and takes me away from painting which is what I really need to be doing to better myself. I plan on painting some larger landscapes and seascapes that will knock the socks off collectors by mid-summer when my show is scheduled. Thanks Keith for your advice, I have to take this in and use it in due time.

Joanne Benson
via fineartviews.com
Hi Keith,
Another great and informative article. I think you have made many excellent points, especially with how to follow up for various scenarios! You are absolutely right on about how much better works look in person.....I like your hints on how to phrase things to the gallerists also....about being respectful of their time, etc. Thanks again! Joanne
Peggy Guichu
via fineartviews.com
That was one of the best posts I have ever read. Filled with helpful advise. Thank you so much for your effort.

What I would add is to not get so excited about landing a gallery that you don't investigate it and read your contract thoroughly before you sign it. I just had a painting literally destroyed by a gallery. I didn't do my homework. I took another artist's word that this was a very reputable gallery. I've been told by other gallery owners since this happened that they destroyed it for the insurance money. Unfortunately I'm not the only one this has happened to. This may be rare, but it happens.



Esther J. Williams
via clintwatson.net
Funny thing, no sooner than I posted my last comment, I got a reply email from one of the galleries I emailed earlier today. Turns out they are looking for new artists and want a few images emailed to them, wish me luck!

Carole Rodrigue
via fineartviews.com
More great advice to use when the time is right. And I guess the bottom message is, never give up if you're serious about your work. There are various ways people have gotten into galleries, but the one constant theme is like Winston said: "Never give up."
Nancy Park
via fineartviews.com
I have always found myself left cold by the thought of participating in the gallery process. Why would I want to share my profits with a gallery? Also, why would I want to have to pry the names of my admirers from a gallery? Most of all, why would I want to paint on a gallery's schedule?

As it is, I can take the time a painting requires for its finish; know and respect my own clients; and best of all, negotiate terms that benefit each of us maximally.

I love the idea of displaying my art, and I also am fond of the idea of meeting the people who buy it. I may not get rich this way, but the process makes me feel rich.

anne watson
via clintwatson.net
Lots of good comments. Thanks Michael and K for answering my question about multiple submissions. I guess that makes the most sense--first come first seved, all things equal.

Nancy, just wondering how you sell most of your work if you stay away from galleries. Online? Art fairs? One nice thing about only private sales is that you are able to keep your prices lower.

Sari Grove
via clintwatson.net
Yes! Astonishing! I had completely forgotten to show works in person! This summer, I answered a listing (that I guess in retrospect was an old listing)...I sent an email with a website link and portfolio information, but then I flipped thinking 'how could they organize a show for July when July has already begun?' ...This mental mistake proved providential...In my worry, I rushed to the gallery with a real painting to show in person...I explained hastily that I was skipping formalities to ensure they had my work in the show...
As it happened, the curator had passed by my submission...In person though, she reprimanded herself out loud for her mistake...
and that's when it dawned on me- in my embrace of the internet I had forgotten for several years to bring works in in person...Wow! Big revelation...
People need to see works in person...Absolutely..Especially if work is at all crossover between abstract and figuration- they can't tell what it is in tiny...

Carol Eaton-Preston
via fineartviews.com
This article was interesting to me for a couple of different reasons. I have been a coop gallery for 5 years and on the selection committee for 2. It always is interesting to me how artists are selected on gut feelings alone. Yes, we look at all that is submitted, but there are just those that stand out in quality of presentation. Sometimes it's just that we need another pastelist or
photographer. I do believe that personal contact is best, and am always happy to meet the artist in person. Galleries also have to work with personalities and it is important to make sure that they all mesh; the art work and the gallery feeling.
Keith Bond
via clintwatson.net
Anne,

I agree with Michael and K. about submitting to more than one gallery. The gallery business is quite different than writing, so the etiquette is also different.

If more than one gallery responds favorably, you have some leverage in negotiating with the galleries. Suddenly you are that much more desirable in the galleries' eyes.

Keith

Keith Bond
via clintwatson.net
Peggy,

Yes, it is important to investigate, interview the gallery to make sure it is good.

Keith Bond
via clintwatson.net
Nancy,

It is true that artists can be successful without a gallery. It is great that it works for you.

On the other hand, to answer your questions of why you would share profits with a gallery - they can open doors and introduce your work to collectors you couldn't reach otherwise. Good galleries earn their commission. And with a good contract you can negotiate getting client information.

A gallery isn't right for every artist, but consider the benefits before completely dismissing the option.

Fay Terry
via fineartviews.com
Keith,
Thanks for your thoughts on gallery representation. I don't have that yet but I am going to be well prepared when I do decide to approach a gallery.

Nancy Park
via clintwatson.net
Most of my sales are from word of mouth or repeat sales to the same clients. I have had a couple of online sales, and some sales from the shows I regularly enter.

They have declined over the past year to the point that I did consider trying to find gallery representation, but I keep seeing the drawbacks to such a move.

Maybe I need to move out of my comfort zone, but the last time I was in a gallery, it closed and took my art with it! I never did manage to find the people who decamped with it.

Monte Wilson
via clintwatson.net
Another fine article Keith with great advice! And you are so right when stating that photos (either digital or print) never do the original work justice. Take museum exhibits for instance. You can pull up their website and look at some photos of a collection of masters and see that work is good but you'll never get just how incredible the work is until you see it in person. Standing in front of a painting completed over a 100 or more years ago studying and admiring the craftsmanship and skill it took to create such a piece is inspiring to say the least. Same holds true with the current work out there...a photo just does not do the original justice. I always encourage people to look at the original if at all possible, be it mine or another's work. And you're correct to say that when a person does look at an original piece, they then have the ability to look at photos of the artist' work in a different light because the subtleties of the original are captured in the subconscious mind and help to fill in what the photo cannot depict.

Cooper
via clintwatson.net
Good morning Keith!
Wow. What a terrrible time to have a good memory. The doubting Thomas in me just pulled an article out of the memorybanks that Clint W wrote, titled "The Moment Of Hope" (Here's a paragraph from the article because I can't figure out how to get the link in here)

"would walk past paintings by true masters in our gallery....people like Kevin Macpherson, David Leffel, Mian Situ and Laura Robb, and confidently announce that they were ready to exhibit their artworks in our gallery. They weren't even close. They literally could not even see the difference between their amateur artwork and the works of artists who had spent a lifetime devoted to getting better day in and day out."

So where is the fine line between confidently approaching a gallery owner about representation, and being the person Clint wrote about? Ha! It's not really a fine line, is it? It's a huge gray area filled with blobs of alternating over-confidence and cringing self doubt. If somebody has the formula for sorting out that gray blob, and beating into submission it's various parts, well then, please send me a copy :)
Later, Cooper


anne watson
via clintwatson.net
Haha, well said, Cooper!

Bonnie Hamlin
via fineartviews.com
Keith, thank you so much for the detailed examples of approaching Galleries, this is so very helpful.


Linda Wilder
via fineartviews.com
Anne, I too have wondered about the etiquette of submitting to multiple galleries and I like Michael and Keith's answers.BTW, your work looks much more vibrant in person( Swirl gallery) than online.

Lorraine Khachatourians
via clintwatson.net
Hello Clint,
I have been following your blog for a little while now and really appreciate all the information you and your guests provide. As another latecomer to painting, I am on a steep learning curve and appreciate all the hard-won wisdom that is shared here. I am still in the 'gray-blob' area too, and although I am unsure at this point if I will ever get to gallery representation, this information still helps for preparing for our local group shows and for submissions for competitions. Thanks again.

Lorraine Khachatourians
via clintwatson.net
Oh, sorry, senora moment! Keith - thank you for this article.
Lorraine K

Marsha Savage
via clintwatson.net
Thanks so much for continuing the conversation about approaching galleries.

I'll have to say each time you send an e-mail with a new post, I can't wait to read it. Your newsletter has become one of my favorites for really timely information for an artist!
Marsha
Diane Tasselmyer
via fineartviews.com
Keith, This article offered very concise, useful information. I liked how you emphasized to everyone the need to be polite not pushy.
I will take to heart what you have written and reference back when necessary.
Thank you for sharing your experience.

David Seibert
via fineartviews.com
Thanks for sharing your insights and experience Keith. I agree that seeing the actual work can be far more impressive than viewing work online. While it may take some time to find that opportunity, it could be worth persevering for a reputable gallery's representation.

Judith Monroe
via fineartviews.com
Great point about digital images not doing the actual work justice, no matter how good they are. (You never know how something will look on someone else's monitor, either, while they're looking at your website.) I've often been told my work is much more impressive in person and even one client who purchased a print online, told me she had wished she had gotten a larger print because it looked better than she had thought, too.

The other great point is to not give up too easily on a particular gallery, but to balance that with a reality check and respect for the gallery owner's time and space.

Thanks!
Sharon Weaver
via fineartviews.com
The comments were as helpful as the article. With so much interest in getting representation this back and forth dialog is great. I have what may be a silly question but does the gallery keep the portfolio or send it back? Should I provide a return address envelope and postage? If you go to a gallery in person do you leave the portfolio with the gallery even if they are not interested? Or do you just forget it and write off the expense?

Keith Bond
via clintwatson.net
Sharon,

When I mail a portfolio, I include a SASE for the return of my materials. If the gallery would like to keep it on file, I don't mind not getting it back. That means they are interested and will likely keep an eye out for my work. As Scott said in his article last week - he follows artists.

If there is no interest, you might as well get it back.



K. Henderson
via clintwatson.net
Back in the olden days when I sent slides in my portfolio, I sent an SASE for their return.

Now that I send photos printed out on my computer I let the gallery do with it as they wish : keep it, toss it, whatever. If they get retruned to me they are smudged and rumpled so I toss them anyway.

This brings up another question: What size photos do you send in your portfolio. I send 4" x 6"
Louise B. Hafesh
via clintwatson.net
Never thought about sending 4x6 photos. Coming from an editorial background, 8 x10 photos were standard. 4 x 6, however, seems an ideal size for art: large enough to view; small enough to handle and file and as an atypical size, more likely to stand out in the crowd of submissions.
Esther J. Williams
via clintwatson.net
Cooper, I have empathy for you, I have been there before in the gray blob state of mind, it`s not fun. We have been hearing "How to Get into a Gallery" but there are also the questions, Who, What, When, Where and Why to get into a gallery, that needs to be answered. The answer to all of the above is as different as each artist`s life is unique. I can not answer all of those questions quickly. It just sparked me into an automatic writing session of six pages of my personal experiences which I can`t place here. I will place that on my blog on my own FASO website which you can link to on my name above. Give me a few minutes and I will type it up. It is about entering juried shows to measure your standing in the art community and within yourself as an artist. I haven`t reached the top yet, but I can sure tell you that I have been through the trenches.

Maria Brophy
via clintwatson.net
This is a great article. I give lectures on the business of art, and "How do I get my art in a gallery" is the number 1 question I get from artists.

I find that most artists don't take the time to educate themselves on HOW they should properly present to a gallery. This article and others like it would help them.

Personally, I'm not that fond of the gallery system. I haven't been able to make half the sales in galleries that I've made on my own. I prefer to sell work through my own database and online. However, I will occasionally do a group art show at a gallery that's close by.

The gallery system is great, though, for an artist who doesn't have representation or isn't able to sell their own works.

My advice to an artist wanting to enter into the gallery system: No doesn't mean no, it just means no for now. Keep at it, and eventually you'll get in there!


Tom Weinkle
via fineartviews.com
In my view Keith's perspective is on the money.I am just beginning my search for representation, and through several informal conversations with gallery owners, they are approached often by any number of ways. It is difficult to get their attention in a meaningful way.

Seeing art through a web browser is difficult. And unless your print reproductions are premium, your work suffers with small scale tear sheets.

The fact is, nothing adequately creates the visceral reaction that comes with the real work's scale, texture, and message.

There are a ton of factors affecting gallery owners decision-making about artists, and Keith highlights one very important reality.

I think your newsletter is terrific. It has underscored some of my pre-conceived notions, and helped to dispel others.

keep it up!

tom weinkle

Bruce Ulrich
via fineartviews.com
Excellent addition to the earlier post on approaching galleries. the work in person is always the best option.
Jennie Rosenbaum
via fineartviews.com
very interesting analogy Clint, thankyou for sharing. It's a wonderful concept to start the year on. I think it is very true. sometimes it is hard to push past all the road blocks (real and imagined) to just revel in the joys of creating and sharing your work. thankyou for reminding us of the beauty of this!
Jennie Rosenbaum
via fineartviews.com
wonderful advice Maria! it's so easy to be discouraged by that little 2 letter word..
Barbara P Hageman
via clintwatson.net with facebook
Keith,

Thanks for giving another comprehensive comment about approaching galleries. Given all the comments on your "Thank You" article, this is a perfect follow-on.

Question to you and others: Many of us do small works to reach into wallets that are tough to reach these days. If there's a gallery that you really aim to "land," is there any value in sending a small (no bigger than 6"x8") of an actual work in your approach package along with the return postage-paid envelope? It's been on my mind, in part, because then they have a live, desk-sized work that they can look at for a while, so that when you do a follow-up call, they have a tangible representation of your work? Just an idea, need some clear-eyed thinking on it, as the small works are relatively easy to do as a warm up to the bigger game.
Donald Smith
via fineartviews.com
Keith,
Your article on approaching art galleries is great.
I’ve got one suggestion you could add to the list. Telling or showing the gallery what you can do for them. I’m not talking about them selling your art, that is more them for you, but show the gallery that you can bring value to their business in more ways than just quality art. How you do that is up to each artist.
Donald

Barbara P Hageman
via clintwatson.net
Donald,
You are right about adding value for a gallery. Several ways that seem to work include: (1)do demonstrations on site at the gallery for invited guests; (2)send personal notes to collectors, per prior blog comments; (3)include your blog information on your bio and business cards to make it easy for the gallery to let clients learn more about you. (4)I go one step further: I comb property records that are in the public domain at any town assessor's office -usually available on a CD. THen, using Excel, and specific criteria. I dump that into an Excel database, convert it to nice mailing labels, and then make a quick comment on cards that have my art image(s) on them as well as my website information, and invite those target prospects to see my work at the gallery...citing my gallery owner's name. This is work some people might think a gallery will do, but I like to maintain my own contact lists in case the gallery doesn't want to share. When I do this, people show up, even if there isn't an opening. When I don't, fewer people show up. So in the long nights of winter, I have something I can work on and refine each year. Labels can be printed out at any time, cards in volume are fairly affordable, so it's the postage that becomes an investment. But my lists are so important that I keep a copy in a safe deposit box at my bank!

Bonnie Hamlin
via clintwatson.net
Esther, I found phoning for submission preference is more effective than email. Might just be the galleries I've contacted (in Canada)though.

Delilah
via clintwatson.net
Very good advice. It such hard work getting into galleries but worth it.










 

FASO Resources and Articles

Art Scammers and Art Scam Searchable Database

 

FineArtViews, FineArtStudioOnline, FASO, BrushBuzz, InformedCollector, BoldBrush
are Trademarks of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc. 

Canvoo is a registered trademark of BoldBrush Technology, LLC Licensed to BoldBrush, Inc

Copyright - BoldBrush Technology, LLC  - All Rights Reserved